Impact of preanaesthetic electrocardiogram on decision making and modification of anaesthetic protocols in dogs

Background: This retrospective observational study explored the impact of preanaesthetic electrocardiogram (ECG) assessment on preoperative echocardiography requests and modifications to a standardised anaesthetic protocol in healthy dogs. Methods: A total of 228 healthy dogs with no previously diag...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Bustamante Domínguez, Rocío, González-Pérez, Eva, Caro Vadillo, Alicia, Aguado Domínguez, Delia
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/107307
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/107307
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:636.09
Anaesthesia
Electrocardiogram
Dog
Preoperative evaluation
Veterinaria
3109 Ciencias Veterinarias
Descrição
Resumo:Background: This retrospective observational study explored the impact of preanaesthetic electrocardiogram (ECG) assessment on preoperative echocardiography requests and modifications to a standardised anaesthetic protocol in healthy dogs. Methods: A total of 228 healthy dogs with no previously diagnosed heart disease that underwent general anaesthesia at Complutense Veterinary Teaching Hospital from December 2017 to June 2018 were included. Preanaesthetic ECGs were assessed for abnormalities, and the findings were documented. The number of dogs requiring echocardiography, based on ECG findings, and the echocardiography results were recorded. All anaesthesia-related decisions were documented. Results: Overall, 72 dogs (31.6%) exhibited ECG abnormalities. Echocardiography was requested for five dogs (2.2%). The anaesthetic protocol was changed in 11 dogs (15.3% of those with ECG abnormalities). P wave disturbances, ventricular premature complexes and impulse conduction issues were abnormalities that prompted echocardiography. Bradycardia and electrical impulse conduction abnormalities influenced protocol modifications. Limitations: The limited sample size meant that it was not possible to investigate potential correlations between demographics and ECG alterations. Conclusions: Preanaesthetic ECG screening was useful for promoting echocardiography and influencing anaesthesia plans in a subset of dogs. Despite this, further assessment of the impact of routine use of non-targeted preoperative ECG on anaesthesia-related outcomes is warranted.