Conducting interfaces between amorphous oxide layers and SrTiO_3(110) and SrTiO_3(111)
Interfaces between (110) and (111)SrTiO_3 (STO) single crystalline substrates and amorphous oxide layers, LaAlO_3 (a-LAO), Y:ZrO_2 (a-YSZ), and SrTiO_3 (a-STO) become conducting above a critical thickness tc. Here we show that t_c for a-LAO is not depending on the substrate orientation, i.e. t_c (a-...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/24360 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/24360 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 537 Oxide interfaces Oxygen vacancies LaAlO_3/SrTiO_3 Física (Física) 22 Física |
| Sumario: | Interfaces between (110) and (111)SrTiO_3 (STO) single crystalline substrates and amorphous oxide layers, LaAlO_3 (a-LAO), Y:ZrO_2 (a-YSZ), and SrTiO_3 (a-STO) become conducting above a critical thickness tc. Here we show that t_c for a-LAO is not depending on the substrate orientation, i.e. t_c (a-LAO/(110)STO) ≈ t_c(a-LAO/(111)STO) interfaces, whereas it strongly depends on the composition of the amorphous oxide: t_c(a-LAO/(110)STO) < t_c(a-YSZ/(110)STO) < t_c(a-STO/(110)STO). It is concluded that the formation of oxygen vacancies in amorphous-type interfaces is mainly determined by the oxygen affinity of the deposited metal ions, rather than orientational-dependent enthalpy vacancy formation and diffusion. Scanning transmission microscopy characterization of amorphous and crystalline LAO/STO(110) interfaces shows much higher amount of oxygen vacancies in the former, providing experimental evidence of the distinct mechanism of conduction in these interfaces. |
|---|