Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation

Objective: To describe the development and clinimetric validation of the Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI) through several evidence sources about reliability and validity in the Spanish context. Design and setting: APNCAI development was based on a multisequential a...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Sastre-Fullana, Pedro, Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose, Sesé-Abad, Albert, Bennasar-Veny, Miquel, Carlos-Fernández, Juan, de Pedro-Gómez, Joan Ernest
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Recursos:Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
Repositorio:Docusalut
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/17173
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17173
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
Consensus
Clinical Competence
Humans
Delphi Technique
Female
Spain
Male
Advanced Practice Nursing
Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
Consenso
Competencia Clínica
Humanos
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Técnica Delfos
Femenino
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada
España
Masculino
id ES_5f78d1e22717954d5692ea2fd8fa3143
oai_identifier_str oai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/17173
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validationSastre-Fullana, PedroMiguel Morales-Asencio, JoseSesé-Abad, AlbertBennasar-Veny, MiquelCarlos-Fernández, Juande Pedro-Gómez, Joan ErnestReproducibility of ResultsReview Literature as TopicConsensusClinical CompetenceHumansDelphi TechniqueFemaleSpainMaleAdvanced Practice NursingLiteratura de Revisión como AsuntoConsensoCompetencia ClínicaHumanosReproducibilidad de los ResultadosTécnica DelfosFemeninoEnfermería de Práctica AvanzadaEspañaMasculinoObjective: To describe the development and clinimetric validation of the Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI) through several evidence sources about reliability and validity in the Spanish context. Design and setting: APNCAI development was based on a multisequential and systematic process: literature review, instrument content consensus through qualitative Delphi method approach (a panel of 51 Advanced Practice in Nursing-APN-experts was selected) and the clinimetric validation process based on a sample of 600 nurses from the Balearic Islands public healthcare setting. Methods: An initial step for tool's content development process based on Delphi method approach of expert consensus was implemented. A subsequent phase of tool validation started from the analysis of APN core competencies latent measurement model, including exploratory and confirmatory techniques. Reliability evidence for each latent factor was also obtained. Items' scores were submitted to descriptive analysis, plus univariate and multivariate normality tests. Results: An eight-factor competency assessment latent model obtained adequate fit, and it was composed by 'Research and Evidence-Based Practice', 'Clinical and Professional Leadership', 'Interprofessional Relationship and Mentoring', 'Professional Autonomy', 'Quality Management', 'Care Management', 'Professional Teaching and Education' and 'Health Promotion'. Conclusions: Adequate empirical evidence of reliability and validity for APNCAI makes it useful for application in healthcare policy programmes for APN competency assessment in Spain.BMJ Publishing Group20172017-02-0120172017-02-01research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17173reponame:Docusalutinstname:Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes BalearsInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:docusalut.com:20.500.13003/171732026-06-22T12:44:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
title Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
spellingShingle Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
Sastre-Fullana, Pedro
Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
Consensus
Clinical Competence
Humans
Delphi Technique
Female
Spain
Male
Advanced Practice Nursing
Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
Consenso
Competencia Clínica
Humanos
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Técnica Delfos
Femenino
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada
España
Masculino
title_short Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
title_full Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
title_fullStr Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
title_full_unstemmed Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
title_sort Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI): clinimetric validation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Sastre-Fullana, Pedro
Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose
Sesé-Abad, Albert
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Carlos-Fernández, Juan
de Pedro-Gómez, Joan Ernest
author Sastre-Fullana, Pedro
author_facet Sastre-Fullana, Pedro
Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose
Sesé-Abad, Albert
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Carlos-Fernández, Juan
de Pedro-Gómez, Joan Ernest
author_role author
author2 Miguel Morales-Asencio, Jose
Sesé-Abad, Albert
Bennasar-Veny, Miquel
Carlos-Fernández, Juan
de Pedro-Gómez, Joan Ernest
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
Consensus
Clinical Competence
Humans
Delphi Technique
Female
Spain
Male
Advanced Practice Nursing
Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
Consenso
Competencia Clínica
Humanos
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Técnica Delfos
Femenino
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada
España
Masculino
topic Reproducibility of Results
Review Literature as Topic
Consensus
Clinical Competence
Humans
Delphi Technique
Female
Spain
Male
Advanced Practice Nursing
Literatura de Revisión como Asunto
Consenso
Competencia Clínica
Humanos
Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
Técnica Delfos
Femenino
Enfermería de Práctica Avanzada
España
Masculino
description Objective: To describe the development and clinimetric validation of the Advanced Practice Nursing Competency Assessment Instrument (APNCAI) through several evidence sources about reliability and validity in the Spanish context. Design and setting: APNCAI development was based on a multisequential and systematic process: literature review, instrument content consensus through qualitative Delphi method approach (a panel of 51 Advanced Practice in Nursing-APN-experts was selected) and the clinimetric validation process based on a sample of 600 nurses from the Balearic Islands public healthcare setting. Methods: An initial step for tool's content development process based on Delphi method approach of expert consensus was implemented. A subsequent phase of tool validation started from the analysis of APN core competencies latent measurement model, including exploratory and confirmatory techniques. Reliability evidence for each latent factor was also obtained. Items' scores were submitted to descriptive analysis, plus univariate and multivariate normality tests. Results: An eight-factor competency assessment latent model obtained adequate fit, and it was composed by 'Research and Evidence-Based Practice', 'Clinical and Professional Leadership', 'Interprofessional Relationship and Mentoring', 'Professional Autonomy', 'Quality Management', 'Care Management', 'Professional Teaching and Education' and 'Health Promotion'. Conclusions: Adequate empirical evidence of reliability and validity for APNCAI makes it useful for application in healthcare policy programmes for APN competency assessment in Spain.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2017-02-01
2017
2017-02-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17173
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13003/17173
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMJ Publishing Group
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Docusalut
instname:Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
instname_str Conselleria de Salut i Consum del Govern de les Illes Balears
reponame_str Docusalut
collection Docusalut
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869409209113640960
score 15,812455

Registos relacionados