Existential sentences with existential quantification
The analysis to be proposed has two notable consequences. First, it indicates that while presupposition may play a role in accounting for the so-called definiteness restriction associated with the construction, presupposition cannot account for all of the definiteness restriction facts-in fact, on t...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 1998 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:recercat.cat:10230/23159 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23159 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anglès -- Semàntica Anglès -- Sintaxi |
| id |
ES_5ef3174a7d1067aab736f0f85fca2d8a |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:recercat.cat:10230/23159 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Existential sentences with existential quantificationMcNally, Louise, 1965-Anglès -- SemànticaAnglès -- SintaxiThe analysis to be proposed has two notable consequences. First, it indicates that while presupposition may play a role in accounting for the so-called definiteness restriction associated with the construction, presupposition cannot account for all of the definiteness restriction facts-in fact, on the view defended here, the definiteness restriction facts cannot be explained by a single generalization. Second, it supports the view that the notions weak and strong should be redefined as suggested in Ladusaw 1994, where “weak” is essentially equated with “nonparticular-denoting”.Springer201520151998info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/23159reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésLinguistics and Philosophy. 1998;21(4):353-92© Springer (The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/231592026-05-29T05:05:01Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| title |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| spellingShingle |
Existential sentences with existential quantification McNally, Louise, 1965- Anglès -- Semàntica Anglès -- Sintaxi |
| title_short |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| title_full |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| title_fullStr |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| title_sort |
Existential sentences with existential quantification |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
McNally, Louise, 1965- |
| author |
McNally, Louise, 1965- |
| author_facet |
McNally, Louise, 1965- |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Anglès -- Semàntica Anglès -- Sintaxi |
| topic |
Anglès -- Semàntica Anglès -- Sintaxi |
| description |
The analysis to be proposed has two notable consequences. First, it indicates that while presupposition may play a role in accounting for the so-called definiteness restriction associated with the construction, presupposition cannot account for all of the definiteness restriction facts-in fact, on the view defended here, the definiteness restriction facts cannot be explained by a single generalization. Second, it supports the view that the notions weak and strong should be redefined as suggested in Ladusaw 1994, where “weak” is essentially equated with “nonparticular-denoting”. |
| publishDate |
1998 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1998 2015 2015 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23159 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10230/23159 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Linguistics and Philosophy. 1998;21(4):353-92 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
© Springer (The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
© Springer (The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com) |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| instname_str |
Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| reponame_str |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| collection |
Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869409168227565569 |
| score |
15,811543 |