Error analysis for the lidar backward inversion algorithm

Here we depart from the inhomogeneous solution of a lidar equation using the backward inversion algorithm that is nowadays generally referred to as the Klett method. In particular, we develop an error sensitivity study that relates errors in the user-input parameters boundary extinction and exponent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rocadenbosch Burillo, Francisco|||0000-0001-8614-4408, Comerón Tejero, Adolfo|||0000-0001-6886-3679
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:1999
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/1521
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/1521
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Optical radar
Meteorological optics
Algorithms
Geophysical signal processing
Inverse problems
Meteorological radar
Optical information processing
Radar signal processing
Remote sensing by laser beam
Lidar backward inversion algorithm
Error analysis
Error sensitivity
User-input parameters boundary extinction
Exponential term
Extinction-to-backscatter relationship
Optical depths
Range-dependent behavior
Optical thickness
Error span
Calibration
Error bound
Atmospheric scenes
Radar òptic
Òptica meteorològica
Algorismes
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Radiocomunicació i exploració electromagnètica::Teledetecció
Descripción
Sumario:Here we depart from the inhomogeneous solution of a lidar equation using the backward inversion algorithm that is nowadays generally referred to as the Klett method. In particular, we develop an error sensitivity study that relates errors in the user-input parameters boundary extinction and exponential term in the extinction-to-backscatter relationship to errors in the inverted extinction profile. The validity of the analysis presented is limited only by the validity of application of the inversion algorithm itself, its numerical performance having been tested for optical depths in the 0.01–10 range. Toward this end, we focus on an introductory background about how uncertainties in these two parameters can apply to a family of inverted extinction profiles rather than a single profile and on its range-dependent behavior as a function of the optical thickness of the lidar inversion range. Next, we performed a mathematical study to derive the error span of the inverted extinction profile that is due to uncertainties in the above-mentioned user calibration parameters. This takes the form of upper and lower range-dependent error bounds. Finally, appropriate inversion plots are presented as application examples of this study to a parameterized set of atmospheric scenes inverted from both synthesized elastic-backscatter lidar signals and a live signal.