Hybrid spatio-temporal CNN–LSTM/BiLSTM models for blocking prediction in elastic optical networks
Elastic optical networks (EONs) must allocate resources dynamically to accommodate heterogeneous, high-bandwidth demands. However, the continuous setup and teardown of connections with different bit rates can fragment the spectrum and lead to blocking. The blocking predictors enable proactive defrag...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/451980 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/451980 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/network5040044 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Elastic optical networks Spectrum fragmentation Blocking prediction Spatio-temporal modeling CNN–LSTM CNN–BiLSTM Deep learning Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació |
| Sumario: | Elastic optical networks (EONs) must allocate resources dynamically to accommodate heterogeneous, high-bandwidth demands. However, the continuous setup and teardown of connections with different bit rates can fragment the spectrum and lead to blocking. The blocking predictors enable proactive defragmentation and resource reallocation within network controllers. In this paper, we propose two novel deep learning models (based on CNN–BiLSTM and CNN–LSTM) to predict blocking in EONs by combining spatial feature extraction from spectrum snapshots using 2D convolutional layers with temporal sequence modeling. This hybrid spatio-temporal design learns how local fragmentation patterns evolve over time, allowing it to detect impending blocking scenarios more accurately than conventional methods. We evaluate our model on the simulated NSFNET topology and compare it against multiple baselines, namely 1D CNN, 2D CNN, k-nearest neighbors (KNN), and support vector machines (SVMs). The results show that the proposed CNN–BiLSTM/LSTM models consistently achieve higher performance. The CNN–BiLSTM model achieved the highest accuracy in blocking prediction, while the CNN–LSTM model shows slightly lower accuracy; however, it has much lower complexity and a faster learning time. |
|---|