Análisis sobre la percepción social. Informe cualitativo C. Monitoring of project impact
In the management of the wild rabbit there are many stakeholders involved. The perceptions of these groups on the situation of the species differ, among other things, depending on the vision that each group has of its main function or the interests that each one defends in relation to the economic,...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | otro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/391529 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/391529 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Actores sociales Conejo de monte Conflictos Península ibérica http://metadata.un.org/sdg/15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss |
| Sumario: | In the management of the wild rabbit there are many stakeholders involved. The perceptions of these groups on the situation of the species differ, among other things, depending on the vision that each group has of its main function or the interests that each one defends in relation to the economic, social or environmental effects of the wild rabbit. These differences may sometimes give rise to conflicts among stakeholders, making it difficult to apply measures for a better and correct management of the species. Knowing, therefore, the opinion of these social actors on the rabbit problem in the Iberian Peninsula is a key aspect for better decision making. With this objective, four zones have been selected, responding to two very different realities of the situation of the species: one, marked by a high abundance of rabbit populations, which causes damage in agriculture (areas of Campiña Cordobesa and La Mancha), and the other characterized by the scarcity or absence of rabbits and the need to promote their populations (areas of El Andévalo and Cardeña-Montoro). In this report we gather for each of these areas the results obtained through personal and group interviews with the main actors involved in the problem of the wild rabbit, namely: farmers and/or livestock breeders, hunters, environmental groups, technicians or representatives of the local/regional administration and environmental rangers. For each of them, information has been collected on the perception of the situation of the wild rabbit (present and past), the knowledge and evaluation of different management actions, the relationship between the different social actors, the governance or the future perspectives of the species. With this, we can establish the main points of consensus and dissent through which we can build better management measures and formulas and avoid potential conflicts that put the conservation of the species at risk. |
|---|