Real-Time Energy Management Strategy of a Fuel Cell Electric Vehicle With Global Optimal Learning
[EN] This article proposes a novel energy management strategy (EMS) for a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV). The strategy combines the offline optimization and online algorithms to guarantee optimal control, real-time performance, and better robustness in an unknown route. In particular, dynamic pro...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/203559 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/203559 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Energy management Batteries Fuel cells State of charge Optimization Dynamic programming Electric vehicles Battery capacity sensitivity Dynamic programming (DP) Fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) Fuzzy rule learning (FRL) MAQUINAS Y MOTORES TERMICOS |
| Sumario: | [EN] This article proposes a novel energy management strategy (EMS) for a fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV). The strategy combines the offline optimization and online algorithms to guarantee optimal control, real-time performance, and better robustness in an unknown route. In particular, dynamic programming (DP) is applied in a database with multiple driving cycles to extract the theoretically optimal power split between the battery and fuel cell with a priori knowledge of the driving conditions. The analysis of the obtained results is then used to extract the rules to embed them in a real-time capable fuzzy controller. In this sense, at the expense of certain calibration effort in the offline phase with the DP results, the proposed strategy allows on-board applicability with suboptimal results. The proposed strategy has been tested in several actual driving cycles, and the results show energy savings between 8.48% and 10.71% in comparison to rule-based strategy and energy penalties between 1.04% and 3.37% when compared with the theoretical optimum obtained by DP. In addition, a sensitivity analysis shows that the proposed strategy can be adapted to different vehicle configurations. As the battery capacity increases, the performance can be further improved by 0.15% and 1.66% in conservative and aggressive driving styles, respectively. |
|---|