A Multilevel Approach to Sentiment Analysis of Figurative Language in Twitter
[EN] Commendable amount of work has been attempted in the field of Sentiment Analysis or Opinion Mining from natural language texts and Twitter texts. One of the main goals in such tasks is to assign polarities (positive or negative) to a piece of text. But, at the same time, one of the important as...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/120701 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/120701 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Figurative text Sentiment analysis Sentiment abruptness measure Irony Sarcasm Metaphor LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS |
| Sumario: | [EN] Commendable amount of work has been attempted in the field of Sentiment Analysis or Opinion Mining from natural language texts and Twitter texts. One of the main goals in such tasks is to assign polarities (positive or negative) to a piece of text. But, at the same time, one of the important as well as difficult issues is how to assign the degree of positivity or negativity to certain texts. The answer becomes more complex when we perform a similar task on figurative language texts collected from Twitter. Figurative language devices such as irony and sarcasm contain an intentional secondary or extended meaning hidden within the expressions. In this paper we present a novel approach to identify the degree of the sentiment (fine grained in an 11-point scale) for the figurative language texts. We used several semantic features such as sentiment and intensifiers as well as we introduced sentiment abruptness, which measures the variation of sentiment from positive to negative or vice versa. We trained our systems at multiple levels to achieve the maximum cosine similarity of 0.823 and minimum mean square error of 2.170. |
|---|