Random strategies are nearly optimal for generalized van der Waerden Games
In a (1 : q) Maker-Breaker game, one of the central questions is to find (or at least estimate) the maximal value of q that allows Maker to win the game. Based on the ideas of Bednarska and Luczak [Bednarska, M., and T. Luczak, Biased positional games for which random strategies are nearly optimal,...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/111534 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/111534 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endm.2017.07.037 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Random variables General Winning Criteria Generalised van der Waerden games Maker-Breaker games Variables aleatòries Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Anàlisi matemàtica::Funcions de variable complexa |
| Sumario: | In a (1 : q) Maker-Breaker game, one of the central questions is to find (or at least estimate) the maximal value of q that allows Maker to win the game. Based on the ideas of Bednarska and Luczak [Bednarska, M., and T. Luczak, Biased positional games for which random strategies are nearly optimal, Combinatorica, 20 (2000), 477–488], who studied biased H-games, we prove general winning criteria for Maker and Breaker and a hypergraph generalization of their result. Furthermore, we study the biased version of a strong generalization of the van der Waerden games introduced by Beck [Beck, J., Van der Waerden and Ramsey type games, Combinatorica, 1 (1981), 103–116] and apply our criteria to determine the threshold bias of these games up to constant factor. As in the result of [Bednarska, M., and T. Luczak, Biased positional games for which random strategies are nearly optimal, Combinatorica, 20 (2000), 477–488], the random strategy for Maker is again the best known strategy. |
|---|