Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.

The purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic outcome of glass ceramic restorations of various thicknesses cemented to composite resin substrates of different shades with multiple cements. 120 samples of IPS e.max® CAD (HT) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate ceramic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Gomes Félix, Catarina Isabel
Tipo de recurso: tesis doctoral
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM)
Repositorio:RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ucam.edu:10952/6648
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10952/6648
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Materiales Cerámicos
Propiedades Ópticas de Materiales
id ES_5af7d7be556638525e4ed3cd538e1d2f
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ucam.edu:10952/6648
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.Gomes Félix, Catarina IsabelMateriales CerámicosPropiedades Ópticas de MaterialesThe purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic outcome of glass ceramic restorations of various thicknesses cemented to composite resin substrates of different shades with multiple cements. 120 samples of IPS e.max® CAD (HT) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate ceramic and 120 samples of VitaBlocs® Mark II (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) feldspathic ceramic in colour A1 were obtained. The samples were cut with a thickness of 0,5mm and 0,8mm. For the simulation of the substrate, 240 samples of FiltekTM Supreme XTE Universal Restorative Body (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) composite resin in colours A2 and A3 were produced with a thickness of 1mm. All samples were polished. After surface treatment, the ceramic samples were cemented to the composite resin samples, according to the groups formed, initially with glycerine and subsequently with RelyXTM Veneer Cement System (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) in the Translucent (TR) and White Opaque (WO) shades, and RelyXTM Universal Resin Cement (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) in the Translucent (TR) shade. The results were obtained through the EasyShade® V (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) spectrophotometer. The analysis of colour difference was carried out through the calculation of ¿Eab and ¿E00 and the analysis of the L*, a* and b* coordinates, as well as their differences (¿L*, ¿a* and ¿b*) were also calculated for each pair of samples. The highest lightness values were obtained from a 0,8mm VitaBlocs® Mark II ceramic cemented to an A2 composite resin base with Veneer WO cement (88,59 ± 1,77) and the lowest from a 0,5mm IPS e.max® ceramic cemented to an A3 composite resin base with Universal TR cement (80,91 ± 0,31). The highest ¿Eab and ¿E00 were obtained from an A3 composite resin base masked with a 0,8mm VitaBlocs® Mark II ceramic and cemented with Veneer WO (20,20 ± 0,65 and 11,16 ± 0,46, respectively). The lowest ¿Eab and ¿E00 were obtained from an A2 composite resin base masked with a 0,5mm IPS e.max® ceramic and cemented with Universal TR (7,50 ± 0,44 and 4,35 ± 0,23, respectively). The aesthetic outcome of glass ceramic restorations can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the ceramic type and thickness, the cement colour used, and the shade of the substrate.MedicinaOdontologíaDurão Maurício, Paulo JoãoRamírez Fernández, María Piedaddo Nascimento Martins, Francisco Eduardo2023info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesishttp://hdl.handle.net/10952/6648reponame:RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murciainstname:Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.ucam.edu:10952/66482026-06-07T18:35:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
title Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
spellingShingle Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
Gomes Félix, Catarina Isabel
Materiales Cerámicos
Propiedades Ópticas de Materiales
title_short Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
title_full Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
title_fullStr Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
title_full_unstemmed Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
title_sort Aesthetic Result of Ceramic Restorations with Different Cements.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Gomes Félix, Catarina Isabel
author Gomes Félix, Catarina Isabel
author_facet Gomes Félix, Catarina Isabel
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Durão Maurício, Paulo João
Ramírez Fernández, María Piedad
do Nascimento Martins, Francisco Eduardo
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Materiales Cerámicos
Propiedades Ópticas de Materiales
topic Materiales Cerámicos
Propiedades Ópticas de Materiales
description The purpose of this study is to assess the aesthetic outcome of glass ceramic restorations of various thicknesses cemented to composite resin substrates of different shades with multiple cements. 120 samples of IPS e.max® CAD (HT) (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) lithium disilicate ceramic and 120 samples of VitaBlocs® Mark II (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) feldspathic ceramic in colour A1 were obtained. The samples were cut with a thickness of 0,5mm and 0,8mm. For the simulation of the substrate, 240 samples of FiltekTM Supreme XTE Universal Restorative Body (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) composite resin in colours A2 and A3 were produced with a thickness of 1mm. All samples were polished. After surface treatment, the ceramic samples were cemented to the composite resin samples, according to the groups formed, initially with glycerine and subsequently with RelyXTM Veneer Cement System (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) in the Translucent (TR) and White Opaque (WO) shades, and RelyXTM Universal Resin Cement (3M ESPE, Minnesota, USA) in the Translucent (TR) shade. The results were obtained through the EasyShade® V (VITA Zahnfabrik, Bad Säckingen, Germany) spectrophotometer. The analysis of colour difference was carried out through the calculation of ¿Eab and ¿E00 and the analysis of the L*, a* and b* coordinates, as well as their differences (¿L*, ¿a* and ¿b*) were also calculated for each pair of samples. The highest lightness values were obtained from a 0,8mm VitaBlocs® Mark II ceramic cemented to an A2 composite resin base with Veneer WO cement (88,59 ± 1,77) and the lowest from a 0,5mm IPS e.max® ceramic cemented to an A3 composite resin base with Universal TR cement (80,91 ± 0,31). The highest ¿Eab and ¿E00 were obtained from an A3 composite resin base masked with a 0,8mm VitaBlocs® Mark II ceramic and cemented with Veneer WO (20,20 ± 0,65 and 11,16 ± 0,46, respectively). The lowest ¿Eab and ¿E00 were obtained from an A2 composite resin base masked with a 0,5mm IPS e.max® ceramic and cemented with Universal TR (7,50 ± 0,44 and 4,35 ± 0,23, respectively). The aesthetic outcome of glass ceramic restorations can be influenced by a variety of factors, including the ceramic type and thickness, the cement colour used, and the shade of the substrate.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10952/6648
url http://hdl.handle.net/10952/6648
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
instname:Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM)
instname_str Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM)
reponame_str RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
collection RIUCAM. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869408760606228480
score 15.301603