San Anselmo y los albores de la «scientia transcendens». Una interpretación aviceniana de la «regula Anselmi»
This article interprets the rule proposed by St. Anselm in <em>Monologion </em>15, following the Avicennian distinction between <em>ens </em>and <em>res</em>. Both the distinction and coincidence between them helps to explain the difference between being understoo...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2021 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/66860 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/66860 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anselmo de Canterbury Avicena filosofía medieval ontología trascendentales |
| Sumario: | This article interprets the rule proposed by St. Anselm in <em>Monologion </em>15, following the Avicennian distinction between <em>ens </em>and <em>res</em>. Both the distinction and coincidence between them helps to explain the difference between being understood as a sphere, and being in a real sense, as “something”. It is concluded that the <em>“regula Anselmi” </em>sets the parameters for a transcendental attribution of the perfections of creatures to the divine essence, given that their intrinsic perfection is such that they can be predicated of both necessary being and possible beings. |
|---|