Implementing a distress screening program in a thoracic surgery service

The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests in detecting cases requiring psychological intervention among patients referred for thoracic surgery. Methods: Emotional distress was evaluated in 105 patients referred for thoracic surgery by means of a diagnosti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Cruzado Rodríguez, Juan Antonio, Martínez García, Vanesa, Salas Gutiérrez, Veronica, Jarabo Sarceda, José Ramón, Fraile Olivero, Carlos Alfredo, Fernández Martín, Elena, Calatayud Gastardi, Joaquín, Gómez Martínez, Ana María, Hernando Trancho, Florentino
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/103696
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/103696
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Emotional distress
Screening
Thoracic surgery
Psychological needs
Psicología (Psicología)
61 Psicología
Descripción
Sumario:The aim of the present study was to examine the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests in detecting cases requiring psychological intervention among patients referred for thoracic surgery. Methods: Emotional distress was evaluated in 105 patients referred for thoracic surgery by means of a diagnostic psychological interview (criterion variable). The screening ability of the following methods was analyzed: the physician’s opinion (Yes/No), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), single-item interview: ‘‘Are you depressed?’’ (Depression Question, ADEP) (1–5) and the single-item interview: ‘‘Are you anxious?’’ (Anxiety Question, ANXQ) (1–5). Results: According to the clinical interview, 34% of the patients were clinical cases requiring psychological intervention. The total HADS (cut-off point of 10) showed a sensitivity=0.89, specificity=0.75 and AUC=0.883; the ADEP scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.79, pecificity=0.74 and AUC=0.795; the ANXQ scale (>1) showed a sensitivity=0.78, specificity=0.41 and AUC=0.690; and the physician’s opinion showed a sensitivity=0.47 and specificity=0.86. Conclusions: A high percentage of patients referred for thoracic surgery required psychological intervention. The best instrument to identify those patients requiring psychological care, taking a psychological interview as the criterion variable, was the total HADS score. This test is brief, simple and well accepted by patients; it is easy to implement within a thoracic surgery service and has a good diagnostic accuracy.