Strict environmental policy: An incentive for FDI

Empirical evidence has so far failed to confirm that lenient environmental regulation attracts investment from polluting firms. We show that a firm may want to relocate to a country with stricter environmental regulation, when the move raises its rival's cost by sufficiently more than its own....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Dijkstra, B.R. (Bouwe R.)|||/items/92826fe4-5918-4156-9337-a596bfdaeb46, Mathew, A.J. (Anuj J.)|||/items/f1eb490c-b27c-4d8f-8c97-d27802351a7d, Mukherjee, A. (Arijit)|||/items/db078674-87dd-4705-b944-e903de53534f
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Navarra
Repositorio:Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/23026
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10171/23026
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Materias Investigacion::Economía y Empresa
Environmental regulation
Polluting firms
Cournot duopoly
Trade and Environment
Foreign Direct Investment
Emission taxation
Descripción
Sumario:Empirical evidence has so far failed to confirm that lenient environmental regulation attracts investment from polluting firms. We show that a firm may want to relocate to a country with stricter environmental regulation, when the move raises its rival's cost by sufficiently more than its own. We model a Cournot duopoly with a foreign and an incumbent domestic firm. When the foreign firm moves to the home country, the domestic government will respond by increasing the environmental tax rate. This may hurt the domestic firm more than the foreign firm. The home (foreign) country's welfare is (usually) lower with FDI.