Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately

OBJECTIVES: Appropriate use of reporting guidelines of health research ensures that articles present readers with a consistent representation of study relevance, methodology, and results. This study evaluated the use of major reporting guidelines.; STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Caulley, Lisa, Catala-Lopez, Ferran, Whelan, Jonathan, Khoury, Michel, Ferraro, Jennifer, Cheng, Wei, Husereau, Don, Altman, Douglas G, Moher, David
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:INCLIVA
Repositorio:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
OAI Identifier:oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p4284
Acceso en línea:https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/4284
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Reporting guideline
Systematic reviews
Economic evaluations
Clinical trials
Animal studies
Research reporting
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: Appropriate use of reporting guidelines of health research ensures that articles present readers with a consistent representation of study relevance, methodology, and results. This study evaluated the use of major reporting guidelines.; STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross-sectional analysis of health research articles citing four major reporting guidelines indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection (up to June 24, 2018). Two independent reviews were performed in a random sample of 200 articles, including clinical trials (N=50), economic evaluations (N=50), systematic reviews (N=50), and animal research studies (N=50). The use of reporting guidelines to guide the reporting of research studies was considered appropriate. Inappropriate uses included the use of the reporting guidelines as a tool to assess the methodological quality of studies or as a guideline on how to design and conduct the studies.; RESULTS: Across all selected reporting guidelines, appropriate use of reporting guidelines was observed in only 39% (95% CI: 32-46%; 78/200) of articles. By contrast, inappropriate use was observed in 41% (95% CI: 34-48%; 82/200), and unclear/other use was observed in 20% (95% CI: 15-26%; 40/200).; CONCLUSIONS: Reporting guidelines of health research studies are frequently used inappropriately. Authors may require further education around appropriate use of the reporting guidelines in research reporting. Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.