Efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure

Introduction: To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pr...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Diaz-Lobato, S, Brouzet, B, Más-Serrano, P, Rocamora, JLS, Castro, AG, Varela, AG, Alises, SM
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2024
País:España
Recursos:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositório:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p18387
Acesso em linha:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/18387
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Acute respiratory failure
Acute on chronic respiratory failure
High-flow nasal cannula therapy
Elderly
Emergency department
Descrição
Resumo:Introduction: To assess the efficacy and safety of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and without criteria for admission to intensive care units (ICU). Methods: Prospective observational study of patients with ARF treated with HFNC who presented clinical and arterial blood gas deterioration after 24 h of medical treatment and oxygenation by conventional systems. The degree of dyspnoea, gas exchange parameters (arterial O-2 pressure/inspired O-2 fraction ratio (PaO2/FiO(2)); oxygen saturation measured by oximetry/ inspired fraction of oxygen (SpO(2)/FiO(2)), ROX index), degree of patient tolerance and mortality were evaluated. These were measured at discharge from the emergency department (ED), 24 h after treatment with conventional oxygenation and 60, 120 min and 24 h after initiation of HFNC. The results were analyzed for all patients as a whole and for patients with hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) < 45 mmHg) separately. Results: 200 patients were included in the study between November 2019 and November 2020, with a mean age of 83 years, predominantly women (61.9%), obese (Body Mass Index (BMI) 31.1), with high comorbidity (Charlson index 4) and mild-moderate degree of dependence (Barthel 60). A number of 128 patients (64%) were hypercapnic. None had respiratory acidosis (pH 7.39). Evaluation at 60 min, 120 min and 24 h showed significant improvement in all patients and in the subgroup of hypercapnic patients with respect to baseline parameters in respiratory rate (RR), dyspnoea, ROX index, PaO2/FiO(2), SpO(2)/FiO(2) and patient comfort. No changes in PaCO2 or level of consciousness were observed. HFNC was well tolerated. Ten patients (5%) died due to progression of the disease causing ARF. Conclusions: HFNC is an effective and safe alternative in elderly patients with ARF not due to COVID-19, refractory to treatment with conventional oxygen therapy and/or intolerant to NIV or CPAP and without criteria for admission to ICU. (c) 2023 Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia. Published by Elsevier Espana, S.L.U.