Association between physiological stress and skin temperature response after a half marathon
Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the association between skin temperature response and the physiological stress after a half marathon. Approach: Seventeen runners were measured 48 h before, 24 h before, 24 h after and 48 h after completing a half marathon. The measurements on...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2019 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | INCLIVA |
| Repositorio: | r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p3802 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/3802 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | infrared thermography thermal image running exercise fatigue recovery |
| Sumario: | Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the association between skin temperature response and the physiological stress after a half marathon. Approach: Seventeen runners were measured 48 h before, 24 h before, 24 h after and 48 h after completing a half marathon. The measurements on each day of testing included blood markers (creatine kinase [CK] and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase [GOT]), perception of pain and fatigue (using a visual analogue scale), skin temperature (using infrared thermography), and jump performance (using countermovement jump test). Main results: CK (p < 0.001 and ES = 2.1), GOT (p = 0.04 and ES = 1.3), and perception of fatigue and pain (p < 0.001 and ES > 1.0) increased 24 h after the half marathon, whereas jump performance decreased (p < 0.01 and ES = 0.4). No increase of skin temperature was observed in the tests after the competition and no regression model was able to predict physiological stress using skin temperature. Only a bivariate correlation was observed between the 24 h variation (pre-24 h) of CK and the skin temperature of the posterior upper limb (p = 0.04 and r = 0.5), and between the 48 h variation (pre-48 h) of pain perceived and the skin temperature of the knee (p < 0.01 and r = 0.6). Significance In conclusion, follow-up on basal skin temperatures does not seem to be an adequate method to detect physiological stress after a half marathon. In line with the observed results, we recommend caution when interpreting peaks in basal skin temperature in field sports assessments. |
|---|