Donor-derived cell-free DNA as a new biomarker for cardiac allograft rejection: A prospective study (FreeDNA-CAR)
Background: There is a long-standing need for a noninvasive biomarker that allows monitoring of cardiac allograft rejection, avoiding the need for periodic endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Methods: Multicenter, observational, prospective study, performed between 2019 and 2023 (NCT04973943). All patien...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/120027 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/120027 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | NTproBNP Acute cardiac rejection Biomarkers Donor-derived cell-free DNA Heart transplantation |
| Sumario: | Background: There is a long-standing need for a noninvasive biomarker that allows monitoring of cardiac allograft rejection, avoiding the need for periodic endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Methods: Multicenter, observational, prospective study, performed between 2019 and 2023 (NCT04973943). All patients underwent 7 per-protocol surveillance EMB during the first postheart transplantation year. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) levels were determined before each EMB, using Next Generation Sequencing Technology (Allonext assay, Eurofins Genome). The primary end-point was the association between dd-cfDNA levels and the presence of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in EMB. Results: The study included 206 patients from 12 centers, with 1,090 pairs of EMB/dd-cfDNA determinations available for analysis. EMB with ACR (n = 49) were associated with dd-cfDNA levels significantly higher than those without, median 0.189% (interquartilic range 0.05-0.70) vs 0.095% (0.04-0.23), p = 0.013. A dd-cfDNA threshold of 0.10% showed a negative predictive value for ACR of 97%. A statistically significant association between N-terminal prohormone of brain (NTProBNP) and dd-cfDNA was also found, with an increase of 0.007% dd-cfDNA (95% confidence interval 0.003-0.011) for every 500 units of NTproBNP, p 0.001. The combination of both biomarkers for diagnosis of ACR showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.681, and this combined approach was significantly better than dd-cfDNA alone (area under the ROC curve 0.603), p = 0.016. Using a cut-off point of 0.10% for dd-cfDNA and 1,000 UI/ml for NTproBNP, negative predictive value increased to 98.1%. Conclusions: dd-cfDNA may be a useful biomarker to rule out significant ACR in a low-risk population. However, a dd-cfDNA value above normal threshold does not correlate robustly with the presence of disease. The combination with NTproBNP, a readily available biomarker, increased the discrimination power of dd-cfDNA alone. Clinical trial notation: Donor-derived Cell-Free DNA as a New Biomarker in Cardiac Acute Rejection, NCT04973943. |
|---|