Urban spatial structure in Barcelona (1902-2011)

This paper investigates the impact of the city's urban spatial structure in shaping population density distribution over time. This research question is relevant in Barcelona because urban population grew at a sustained pace in various decades due to intense immigration inflows. When the urban...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: García López, Miquel-Àngel|||0000-0002-0515-2922, Nicolini, Rosella|||0000-0002-3331-8926, Roig Sabaté, José Luis|||0000-0003-2793-4631
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:322057
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/322057
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s12061-020-09365-0
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Migration
Population
Urban spatial structure
SDG 10 - Reduced inequalities
SDG 11 - Sustainable cities and communities
Descripción
Sumario:This paper investigates the impact of the city's urban spatial structure in shaping population density distribution over time. This research question is relevant in Barcelona because urban population grew at a sustained pace in various decades due to intense immigration inflows. When the urban spatial structure fails to behave as the backbone of population density distribution, population distribution can suffer from polarization problems. We conduct our empirical study using an urban monocentric framework, tracking the different spatial distribution patterns of the overall population and a few selected urban communities in light of the degree of attractiveness of the central business district (CBD). To this end, we construct an original database by each district in Barcelona from 1902 to 2011 and perform an econometric analysis. Our results reveal that the urban spatial structure continued to be a crucial determinant over time for shaping the overall population distribution in Barcelona and in almost all selected communities. However, its importance fluctuated over time, bottoming out in the 1950s-1960s, and whose resurgence was mostly driven by the political initiative to create a new centrality in the urban periphery. This policy reinforced the attractiveness of the CBD, resulting in the de-facto avoidance of urban polarization.