Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments

Let’s face it. There is no way to restore an ecosystem, not to mention an entire landscape. The amazing diversity of organisms contained in an ecosystem, even the tiniest one, and the variety of the interactions needed to generate so many functions should be regarded as a unique wonder. As ecologica...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Merino García, Agustín, Doni, Serena, Evelpidou, Niki, Ferreira, Teresa, García Arias, Ana Isabel, Masciandaro, Grazia, Rodríguez González, Patricia M.
Formato: livro
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
Repositorio:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/42217
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/10347/42217
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Wetlands
Sustainable management
Erosion
Land rehabilitation
Ecosystem services
id ES_50a0fbc97c79fde7ae3504e4527576db
oai_identifier_str oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/42217
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environmentsMerino García, AgustínDoni, SerenaEvelpidou, NikiFerreira, TeresaGarcía Arias, Ana IsabelMasciandaro, GraziaRodríguez González, Patricia M.WetlandsSustainable managementErosionLand rehabilitationEcosystem servicesEcosystem servicesLet’s face it. There is no way to restore an ecosystem, not to mention an entire landscape. The amazing diversity of organisms contained in an ecosystem, even the tiniest one, and the variety of the interactions needed to generate so many functions should be regarded as a unique wonder. As ecological restoration progresses, we are increasingly convinced that it can never substitute protection and conservation. Ecosystem’s complexity is so overwhelming, that we need to cut them into pieces before we can try to understand it. Not surprisingly, when it is time for rebuilding, we focus on dominant, key, charismatic species, hoping that the many bolts and nuts that are left aside will spontaneously join a machine that will run finely. Furthermore, we want the ecosystem recovered in a legislative period or a few decades, disregarding the increasing amount of evidence showing that the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances can be detected after millennia of secondary succession. Ecological restoration is about speed and acceleration, thus assuming that tempo is not an integral part of ecological processes. We use large amounts of exogenous energy in the form of fertilizers, organic amendments, physical structures, geomorphic profiling, seed banks, machinery, nurseries and labor to summarize a process that may last for centuries into a few years or decades. While doing this, we forget that biodiversity is inversely related to energy flow (d2B/dt2 = –dD/dt, where B is biomass, D is diversity and t is time, as Margalef (1968) suggested). Clearly, more studies are needed to understand the relationship between energy inputs, community assemblage and ecosystem function, that is, between resources committed and restoration success.IBADER (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela-Lugo)Merino García, AgustínDoni, SerenaEvelpidou, NikiGarcía Arias, Ana IsabelMasciandaro, GraziaRodríguez González, Patricia M.Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química AgrícolaUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Economía Aplicada20192019-01-0120192019-01-01bookhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33info:eu-repo/semantics/bookapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/42217reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostelainstname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/422172026-06-15T12:47:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
title Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
spellingShingle Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
Merino García, Agustín
Wetlands
Sustainable management
Erosion
Land rehabilitation
Ecosystem services
Ecosystem services
title_short Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
title_full Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
title_fullStr Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
title_full_unstemmed Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
title_sort Best practices in evaluation and restoration of degraded mediterranean environments
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Merino García, Agustín
Doni, Serena
Evelpidou, Niki
Ferreira, Teresa
García Arias, Ana Isabel
Masciandaro, Grazia
Rodríguez González, Patricia M.
author Merino García, Agustín
author_facet Merino García, Agustín
Doni, Serena
Evelpidou, Niki
Ferreira, Teresa
García Arias, Ana Isabel
Masciandaro, Grazia
Rodríguez González, Patricia M.
author_role author
author2 Doni, Serena
Evelpidou, Niki
Ferreira, Teresa
García Arias, Ana Isabel
Masciandaro, Grazia
Rodríguez González, Patricia M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Merino García, Agustín
Doni, Serena
Evelpidou, Niki
García Arias, Ana Isabel
Masciandaro, Grazia
Rodríguez González, Patricia M.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Edafoloxía e Química Agrícola
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Economía Aplicada

dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Wetlands
Sustainable management
Erosion
Land rehabilitation
Ecosystem services
Ecosystem services
topic Wetlands
Sustainable management
Erosion
Land rehabilitation
Ecosystem services
Ecosystem services
description Let’s face it. There is no way to restore an ecosystem, not to mention an entire landscape. The amazing diversity of organisms contained in an ecosystem, even the tiniest one, and the variety of the interactions needed to generate so many functions should be regarded as a unique wonder. As ecological restoration progresses, we are increasingly convinced that it can never substitute protection and conservation. Ecosystem’s complexity is so overwhelming, that we need to cut them into pieces before we can try to understand it. Not surprisingly, when it is time for rebuilding, we focus on dominant, key, charismatic species, hoping that the many bolts and nuts that are left aside will spontaneously join a machine that will run finely. Furthermore, we want the ecosystem recovered in a legislative period or a few decades, disregarding the increasing amount of evidence showing that the effects of natural and anthropogenic disturbances can be detected after millennia of secondary succession. Ecological restoration is about speed and acceleration, thus assuming that tempo is not an integral part of ecological processes. We use large amounts of exogenous energy in the form of fertilizers, organic amendments, physical structures, geomorphic profiling, seed banks, machinery, nurseries and labor to summarize a process that may last for centuries into a few years or decades. While doing this, we forget that biodiversity is inversely related to energy flow (d2B/dt2 = –dD/dt, where B is biomass, D is diversity and t is time, as Margalef (1968) suggested). Clearly, more studies are needed to understand the relationship between energy inputs, community assemblage and ecosystem function, that is, between resources committed and restoration success.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2019-01-01
2019
2019-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv book
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2f33
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/book
format book
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10347/42217
url https://hdl.handle.net/10347/42217
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBADER (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela-Lugo)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IBADER (Universidade de Santiago de Compostela-Lugo)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
instname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
instname_str Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
reponame_str Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
collection Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407903143690240
score 15,812429