B chromosome transcriptional inactivation in the spermatogenesis of the Grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans

Background/Objectives: We analyzed the relationship between synapsis, recombination, and transcription during the spermatogenesis of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans carrying B chromosomes (type B1). Methods: The progression of synapsis was interpreted according to the dynamics of the cohesin s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Santos Coloma, Juan Luis, Parra,María Teresa, Arévalo, Sara, Guajardo Grence, Andrea, Page, Jesús, Suja, José Ángel, García de la Vega, Carlos, Viera, Alberto
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/118067
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/118067
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:575
576.3
595.727
Sex chromosomes
B chromosomes
Meiosis
Transcriptional activity
Grasshopper
Histone modifications
Eyprepocnemis plorans
Genética
Insectos
2409.90 Citogenética Animal
2413 Biología de Insectos (Entomología)
Descripción
Sumario:Background/Objectives: We analyzed the relationship between synapsis, recombination, and transcription during the spermatogenesis of the grasshopper Eyprepocnemis plorans carrying B chromosomes (type B1). Methods: The progression of synapsis was interpreted according to the dynamics of the cohesin subunit SMC3 axes. DNA double-strand breaks were revealed by RAD51 immunolabeling, while transcriptional activity was determined by the presence of RNA polymerase II phosphorylated at serine 2 (pRNApol II) immunolabeling. The two repressive epigenetic modifications, histone H3 methylated at lysine 9 (H3K9me3) and histone H2AX phosphorylated at serine 139 (γ-H2AX), were employed to reveal transcriptional inactivity. Results: During prophase I, spermatocytes with one B1 chromosome showed overall transcription except in the regions occupied by both the X and the B1 chromosomes. This transcriptional inactivity was accompanied by the accumulation of repressive epigenetic modifications. When two B1 chromosomes were present, they could appear as a fully synapsed monochiasmatic bivalent, showing intense H3K9me3 labeling and absence of pRNApol II, while γ-H2AX labeling was similar to that shown by the autosomes. Conclusions: According to our results, B1 transcriptional inactivation was triggered in spermatogonia, long before the beginning of meiosis, and was accompanied by H3K9me3 heterochromatinization that was maintained throughout spermatogenesis. Moreover, when two B1 were present, the transcriptional inactivation did not preclude synapsis and recombination achievement by these chromosomes.