Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement

Analysing the environmental actorness of the EU, more than one voice has spoken of the myth of a Green Europe and a dismantling process of its environmental ambitions. To date, any attempt to quantify this in a homogeneous fashion by different levels of government and institutions has run into serio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Badell Sánchez, Diego, Rosell i Segura, Jordi
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repositorio:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/48961
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/48961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13204
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:EU environmental policy
EU institutions
Green public procurement
Policy-making
Green Europe
id ES_4f36ff78db9fe11327c455d7c07addbb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/48961
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurementBadell Sánchez, DiegoRosell i Segura, JordiEU environmental policyEU institutionsGreen public procurementPolicy-makingGreen EuropeAnalysing the environmental actorness of the EU, more than one voice has spoken of the myth of a Green Europe and a dismantling process of its environmental ambitions. To date, any attempt to quantify this in a homogeneous fashion by different levels of government and institutions has run into serious difficulties. This research, however, uses green public procurement (GPP) as the research instrument to quantify the commitment to environmental policies. We construct the database from tenders published in the Supplement to the Official Journal between 2009 and 2019. Based on more than 743,061 observations, the article finds that the EU's institutions have the lowest GPP adoption rates in relation to all other levels of government. Moreover, it also records marked differences between the EU institutions where the European Parliament is performing better than the European Commission and, during Juncker Commission, EC performs worse.Diego Badell wishes to acknowledge the Observatory of European Foreign Policy-Secretaria General de Recerca (SGR), funded by the Agency for Management of University Research Grants (AGAUR) of the Catalan Government (Grant agreement: 2017-SGR-693). Jordi Rosell thanks Catalan (Grant agreement: 2017-SGR-644) and Spanish (Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, PID2019-104319RB-I00) governments for their projects and Serra Hunter program for the assistant professor position.Wiley202120212021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/48961http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13204reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPFinstname:Universitat Pompeu FabraInglésJ Common Mark Stud. 2021 Nov;59(6):1555-72© The Authors. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies published by University Association for Contemporary European Studies and John Wiley & Sons LtdThis is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/489612026-06-12T07:21:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
title Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
spellingShingle Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
Badell Sánchez, Diego
EU environmental policy
EU institutions
Green public procurement
Policy-making
Green Europe
title_short Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
title_full Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
title_fullStr Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
title_full_unstemmed Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
title_sort Are EU institutions still green actors? An empirical study of green public procurement
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Badell Sánchez, Diego
Rosell i Segura, Jordi
author Badell Sánchez, Diego
author_facet Badell Sánchez, Diego
Rosell i Segura, Jordi
author_role author
author2 Rosell i Segura, Jordi
author2_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv EU environmental policy
EU institutions
Green public procurement
Policy-making
Green Europe
topic EU environmental policy
EU institutions
Green public procurement
Policy-making
Green Europe
description Analysing the environmental actorness of the EU, more than one voice has spoken of the myth of a Green Europe and a dismantling process of its environmental ambitions. To date, any attempt to quantify this in a homogeneous fashion by different levels of government and institutions has run into serious difficulties. This research, however, uses green public procurement (GPP) as the research instrument to quantify the commitment to environmental policies. We construct the database from tenders published in the Supplement to the Official Journal between 2009 and 2019. Based on more than 743,061 observations, the article finds that the EU's institutions have the lowest GPP adoption rates in relation to all other levels of government. Moreover, it also records marked differences between the EU institutions where the European Parliament is performing better than the European Commission and, during Juncker Commission, EC performs worse.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021
2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/48961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13204
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/48961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13204
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv J Common Mark Stud. 2021 Nov;59(6):1555-72
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
instname:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
instname_str Universitat Pompeu Fabra
reponame_str Repositorio Digital de la UPF
collection Repositorio Digital de la UPF
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407805497147392
score 15,198674