Comparison of Minimum Detectable Crack Size in a Geared System From Three Different Vibration Transducer Types
Acoustic and vibration signals contain distinctive patterns useful for detecting defects in machinery. A number of signal processing strategies has been proposed for detecting and quantifying incipient defects in gears. Non intrusive measurement techniques like those based on Laser Doppler Vibrometr...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/7270 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10578/7270 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Acelerómetros Engranajes Transductores Láser |
| Sumario: | Acoustic and vibration signals contain distinctive patterns useful for detecting defects in machinery. A number of signal processing strategies has been proposed for detecting and quantifying incipient defects in gears. Non intrusive measurement techniques like those based on Laser Doppler Vibrometry and microphones need to be studied in order to help users in selecting the appropriate transducer according to the application. This paper presents an experimental design to determine, as a novel contribution, the minimum detectable crack size in a geared system comparing three different transducers: a microphone, an accelerometer and a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV). The comparison intends to discriminate the three transducers with respect to its early detection capability. Experiments were conducted in a closed loop torque test rig for several torque levels and speeds. Experimental factorial design was used to determine the main effects and their interactions in the detection process. The well-known Hilbert and wavelet transforms have been used as signal processing technique. Their advantages in the detection of incipient defects are highlighted in the paper. The results indicate that the acoustic signal stands out as the method that first detects an incipient progressive crack in gears (it detected cracks 1.3mm long), although, as a drawback, the results obtained using the microphone signal are more sensitive to speed and torque. The second place was for LDV with 1.8mm crack detection, and the third place for the accelerometer with 2.3mm crack detection. |
|---|