Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis

In this editorial discussion we reflect on the issues addressed by, and arising from, the papers in this Special Issue on Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) study methodology. We identify areas of consensus and disagreement regarding the conduct and analysis of SCED studies. Despite the long his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Manolov, Rumen, Gast, David L., Perdices, Michael, Evans, Jonathan J.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2014
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/108251
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/108251
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Investigació de cas únic
Estadística
Single subject research
Statistics
id ES_4e85755d76fe508b693770f504d793e2
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:2445/108251
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysisManolov, RumenGast, David L.Perdices, MichaelEvans, Jonathan J.Investigació de cas únicEstadísticaSingle subject researchStatisticsIn this editorial discussion we reflect on the issues addressed by, and arising from, the papers in this Special Issue on Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) study methodology. We identify areas of consensus and disagreement regarding the conduct and analysis of SCED studies. Despite the long history of application of SCEDs in studies of interventions in clinical and educational settings, the field is still developing. There is an emerging consensus on methodological quality criteria for many aspects of SCEDs, but disagreement on what are the most appropriate methods of SCED data analysis. Our aim is to stimulate this ongoing debate and highlight issues requiring further attention from applied researchers and methodologists. In addition we offer tentative criteria to support decision making in relation to selection of analytical techniques in SCED studies. Finally, we stress that large-scale interdisciplinary collaborations, such as the current Special Issue, are necessary if SCEDs are going to play a significant role in the development of the evidence base for clinical practice.Taylor and Francis2017201720142017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion36 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/108251Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.903199Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2014, vol. 24, num. 3-4, p. 634-660https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.903199(c) Taylor and Francis, 2014info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:2445/1082512026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
title Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
spellingShingle Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
Manolov, Rumen
Investigació de cas únic
Estadística
Single subject research
Statistics
title_short Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
title_full Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
title_fullStr Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
title_sort Single-case experimental designs: Reflections on conduct and analysis
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Manolov, Rumen
Gast, David L.
Perdices, Michael
Evans, Jonathan J.
author Manolov, Rumen
author_facet Manolov, Rumen
Gast, David L.
Perdices, Michael
Evans, Jonathan J.
author_role author
author2 Gast, David L.
Perdices, Michael
Evans, Jonathan J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Investigació de cas únic
Estadística
Single subject research
Statistics
topic Investigació de cas únic
Estadística
Single subject research
Statistics
description In this editorial discussion we reflect on the issues addressed by, and arising from, the papers in this Special Issue on Single Case Experimental Design (SCED) study methodology. We identify areas of consensus and disagreement regarding the conduct and analysis of SCED studies. Despite the long history of application of SCEDs in studies of interventions in clinical and educational settings, the field is still developing. There is an emerging consensus on methodological quality criteria for many aspects of SCEDs, but disagreement on what are the most appropriate methods of SCED data analysis. Our aim is to stimulate this ongoing debate and highlight issues requiring further attention from applied researchers and methodologists. In addition we offer tentative criteria to support decision making in relation to selection of analytical techniques in SCED studies. Finally, we stress that large-scale interdisciplinary collaborations, such as the current Special Issue, are necessary if SCEDs are going to play a significant role in the development of the evidence base for clinical practice.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2017
2017
2017
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/108251
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/108251
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió postprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.903199
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2014, vol. 24, num. 3-4, p. 634-660
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2014.903199
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) Taylor and Francis, 2014
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) Taylor and Francis, 2014
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 36 p.
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor and Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Psicologia Social i Psicologia Quantitativa)
reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407761768382464
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia