Trascendencia e inmanencia del Intelecto. Los casos de Anaxágoras y Giordano Bruno
The article presents and compares the perspectives of Anaxagoras and Giordano Bruno on the intellect as an efficient cause of the world. It is shown that while both concepts indicate the transcendence and the immanence of the intellect, neither manages to establish either transcendence or immanence...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Navarra |
| Repositorio: | Dadun. Depósito Académico Digital de la Universidad de Navarra |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dadun.unav.edu:10171/59160 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10171/59160 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anaxágoras Giordano Bruno intelecto universal inmanencia |
| Sumario: | The article presents and compares the perspectives of Anaxagoras and Giordano Bruno on the intellect as an efficient cause of the world. It is shown that while both concepts indicate the transcendence and the immanence of the intellect, neither manages to establish either transcendence or immanence in a categorical manner. This ambivalence shows that the intelligent cause of the world is detectable in nature because of its actions, but not because of its being. |
|---|