International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law

According to the CJEU’s case law, the tax disadvantage suffered by taxpayers in a cross-border situation arising from international juridical double taxation does not constitute a forbidden obstacle to free movement because it is a consequence of Member States’ definition of tax jurisdiction. Nevert...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Mendonça, Maria Júlia Ildefonso
Tipo de recurso: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:CBUC, CESCA
Repositorio:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
OAI Identifier:oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/687857
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10803/687857
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:International juridical double taxation
Doble imposición jurídica internacional
Derecho de la UE
EU law
34
id ES_4e2ebe41808beb9a40ff1b6b41b7b849
oai_identifier_str oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/687857
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
title International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
spellingShingle International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
Mendonça, Maria Júlia Ildefonso
International juridical double taxation
Doble imposición jurídica internacional
Derecho de la UE
EU law
34
title_short International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
title_full International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
title_fullStr International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
title_full_unstemmed International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
title_sort International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU law
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Maria Júlia Ildefonso
author Mendonça, Maria Júlia Ildefonso
author_facet Mendonça, Maria Júlia Ildefonso
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Agulló Agüero, Antonia
Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Dret
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv International juridical double taxation
Doble imposición jurídica internacional
Derecho de la UE
EU law
34
topic International juridical double taxation
Doble imposición jurídica internacional
Derecho de la UE
EU law
34
description According to the CJEU’s case law, the tax disadvantage suffered by taxpayers in a cross-border situation arising from international juridical double taxation does not constitute a forbidden obstacle to free movement because it is a consequence of Member States’ definition of tax jurisdiction. Nevertheless, from an ability-to-pay perspective, this disadvantage may also be perceived as resulting from a Member State’s exercise of taxing powers in a discriminatory or restrictive way. From this perspective, the issue is no longer whether international juridical double taxation is compatible with the EU law but whether disregarding taxpayers’ overall ability in cross-border situations is in accordance with the EU law, given the evolution of the CJEU’s case law on the matter, in particular, concerning the consideration of expenses related to economic activity and personal and family circumstances. This research aims to address this perspective of international juridical double taxation by assessing the relevance of taxpayers’ overall ability to pay in the light of EU law through an exhaustive analysis of the CJEU’s case law in cases in which international juridical double taxation was not eliminated and in which, despite being eliminated, taxpayers’ ability to pay was undermined in the process.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2023
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10803/687857
url http://hdl.handle.net/10803/687857
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 409 p.
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Pompeu Fabra
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Pompeu Fabra
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
reponame:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
instname:CBUC, CESCA
instname_str CBUC, CESCA
reponame_str TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
collection TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407739753529344
spelling International juridical double taxation and individuals' ability to pay in the light of EU lawMendonça, Maria Júlia IldefonsoInternational juridical double taxationDoble imposición jurídica internacionalDerecho de la UEEU law34According to the CJEU’s case law, the tax disadvantage suffered by taxpayers in a cross-border situation arising from international juridical double taxation does not constitute a forbidden obstacle to free movement because it is a consequence of Member States’ definition of tax jurisdiction. Nevertheless, from an ability-to-pay perspective, this disadvantage may also be perceived as resulting from a Member State’s exercise of taxing powers in a discriminatory or restrictive way. From this perspective, the issue is no longer whether international juridical double taxation is compatible with the EU law but whether disregarding taxpayers’ overall ability in cross-border situations is in accordance with the EU law, given the evolution of the CJEU’s case law on the matter, in particular, concerning the consideration of expenses related to economic activity and personal and family circumstances. This research aims to address this perspective of international juridical double taxation by assessing the relevance of taxpayers’ overall ability to pay in the light of EU law through an exhaustive analysis of the CJEU’s case law in cases in which international juridical double taxation was not eliminated and in which, despite being eliminated, taxpayers’ ability to pay was undermined in the process.Según la jurisprudencia del TJUE, la desventaja fiscal sufrida por los contribuyentes en situación transfronteriza derivada de la doble imposición jurídica internacional no constituye un obstáculo prohibido a la libre circulación por ser una consecuencia de la definición de la jurisdicción fiscal de los Estados miembros. Sin embargo, desde la perspectiva de la capacidad contributiva, esta desventaja también puede percibirse como resultado del ejercicio de los poderes tributarios de un Estado miembro de una forma discriminatoria o restrictiva. Desde esta perspectiva, no se trata de analizar si la doble imposición jurídica internacional es compatible con el Derecho de la UE, sino de determinar si la no consideración de la capacidad contributiva global de los contribuyentes en situación transfronteriza es conforme al Derecho de la UE, dada la evolución de la jurisprudencia fiscal del TJUE en la materia. En particular, en relación con la renta neta y los gastos personales y familiares. Esta investigación pretende abordar esta perspectiva de la doble imposición jurídica internacional, evaluando la relevancia de la capacidad contributiva global de los contribuyentes a la luz del Derecho de la UE, a través de un exhaustivo análisis de la jurisprudencia del TJUE en aquellos casos en que la doble imposición jurídica internacional no ha sido eliminada y en los que, siendo eliminada, se vulneró en el proceso la capacidad contributiva.Programa de doctorat en DretUniversitat Pompeu FabraAgulló Agüero, AntoniaUniversitat Pompeu Fabra. Departament de Dret202320252023info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion409 p.application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10803/687857TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)reponame:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Redinstname:CBUC, CESCAInglésADVERTIMENT. Tots els drets reservats. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.tdx.cat:10803/6878572026-06-14T12:46:07Z
score 15,301603