Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe
Anger, disgust, surprise, and awe are multifaceted emotions. Both anger and disgust are associated with feeling unpleasant as well as experiencing a sense of confidence, whereas surprise and awe tend to be more pleasant emotions that are associated with doubt. Most prior work has examined how apprai...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/29699 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10578/29699 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Affective and cognitive validation Thoughts Anger Disgust Surprise Awe Validación afectiva y cognitiva Pensamientos Ira Asco Sorpresa Asombro |
| id |
ES_4ce02b74ed774ae9ac511e7df36e853d |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/29699 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and aweBriñol, PabloPetty, Richard E.Stavraki, MaríaLamprinakos, GrigoriosWagner, BenjaminDíaz Méndez, Darío NuñoAffective and cognitive validationThoughtsAngerDisgustSurpriseAweValidación afectiva y cognitivaPensamientosIraAscoSorpresaAsombroAnger, disgust, surprise, and awe are multifaceted emotions. Both anger and disgust are associated with feeling unpleasant as well as experiencing a sense of confidence, whereas surprise and awe tend to be more pleasant emotions that are associated with doubt. Most prior work has examined how appraisals (confidence, pleasantness) lead people to experience different emotions or to experience different levels of intensity within the same emotion. Instead, the current research focused on the consequences (rather the antecedents) of appraisals of emotion, and it focuses specifically on the consequences for thought usage rather than the consequences for generating many or few thoughts. We show that when these four emotions are induced following thought generation, thoughts can be used either more or less with each emotion depending on whether the pleasantness/unpleasantness or confidence/doubt appraisal is made salient. In five experiments, it was predicted and found that anger and disgust following thought generation led to more thought use than surprise and awe when a confidence appraisal for the emotion was encouraged, but led to less thought use than surprise and awe when a pleasantness appraisal was made salient. The current studies are the first to reveal that different appraisals can lead to different (even opposite) outcomes on thought usage within the same experimental design.La ira, el disgusto, la sorpresa y el asombro son emociones multifacéticas. Tanto la ira como el disgusto están asociados con sentirse desagradable y experimentar una sensación de confianza, mientras que la sorpresa y el asombro tienden a ser emociones más placenteras que están asociadas con la duda. La mayoría de los trabajos anteriores han examinado cómo las tasaciones (confianza, amabilidad) llevan a las personas a experimentar diferentes emociones o a experimentar diferentes niveles de intensidad dentro de la misma emoción. En cambio, la investigación actual se centró en las consecuencias (más bien los antecedentes) de las valoraciones de la emoción, y se centra específicamente en las consecuencias para el pensamiento uso en lugar de las consecuencias de generar muchos o pocos pensamientos. Mostramos que cuando estos cuatro las emociones se inducen después de la generación de pensamientos, los pensamientos se pueden usar más o menos con cada emoción según se haga la valoración de agrado/desagrado o confianza/duda saliente. En cinco experimentos, se predijo y encontró que la ira y el asco después del pensamiento generación condujo a más uso del pensamiento que sorpresa y asombro cuando una evaluación de confianza para la emoción se animó, pero condujo a menos uso del pensamiento que sorpresa y asombro cuando se realizó una evaluación de simpatía. destacado. Los estudios actuales son los primeros en revelar que diferentes valoraciones pueden conducir a diferentes (incluso opuesto) resultados sobre el uso del pensamiento dentro del mismo diseño experimental.American Psychological Association202220222018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10578/29699reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLMinstname:Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/296992026-05-27T07:36:41Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| title |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| spellingShingle |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe Briñol, Pablo Affective and cognitive validation Thoughts Anger Disgust Surprise Awe Validación afectiva y cognitiva Pensamientos Ira Asco Sorpresa Asombro |
| title_short |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| title_full |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| title_fullStr |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| title_sort |
Affective and cognitive validation of thoughts: An appraisal perspective on anger, disgust, surprise, and awe |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Briñol, Pablo Petty, Richard E. Stavraki, María Lamprinakos, Grigorios Wagner, Benjamin Díaz Méndez, Darío Nuño |
| author |
Briñol, Pablo |
| author_facet |
Briñol, Pablo Petty, Richard E. Stavraki, María Lamprinakos, Grigorios Wagner, Benjamin Díaz Méndez, Darío Nuño |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Petty, Richard E. Stavraki, María Lamprinakos, Grigorios Wagner, Benjamin Díaz Méndez, Darío Nuño |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Affective and cognitive validation Thoughts Anger Disgust Surprise Awe Validación afectiva y cognitiva Pensamientos Ira Asco Sorpresa Asombro |
| topic |
Affective and cognitive validation Thoughts Anger Disgust Surprise Awe Validación afectiva y cognitiva Pensamientos Ira Asco Sorpresa Asombro |
| description |
Anger, disgust, surprise, and awe are multifaceted emotions. Both anger and disgust are associated with feeling unpleasant as well as experiencing a sense of confidence, whereas surprise and awe tend to be more pleasant emotions that are associated with doubt. Most prior work has examined how appraisals (confidence, pleasantness) lead people to experience different emotions or to experience different levels of intensity within the same emotion. Instead, the current research focused on the consequences (rather the antecedents) of appraisals of emotion, and it focuses specifically on the consequences for thought usage rather than the consequences for generating many or few thoughts. We show that when these four emotions are induced following thought generation, thoughts can be used either more or less with each emotion depending on whether the pleasantness/unpleasantness or confidence/doubt appraisal is made salient. In five experiments, it was predicted and found that anger and disgust following thought generation led to more thought use than surprise and awe when a confidence appraisal for the emotion was encouraged, but led to less thought use than surprise and awe when a pleasantness appraisal was made salient. The current studies are the first to reveal that different appraisals can lead to different (even opposite) outcomes on thought usage within the same experimental design. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 2022 2022 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10578/29699 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10578/29699 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Psychological Association |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM instname:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| reponame_str |
RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| collection |
RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869407655536099328 |
| score |
15,300719 |