Evidence for an ηc(1 S) π- resonance in B0→ ηc(1 S) K+π- decays

A Dalitz plot analysis of B0 → ηc(1S)K +π− decays is performed using data samples of pp collisions collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of √s = 7, 8 and 13 TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 4.7 fb−1. A satisfactory description of the data is obtained when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Alfonso Albero, Alejandro, Calvo Gomez, M., Camboni, Alessandro, Coquereau, Samuel, Garrido Beltrán, Lluís, Gascón Fora, David, Gironella Gironell, Pere, Graciani Díaz, Ricardo, Graugés Pous, Eugeni, Vazquez Gomez, R., LHCb collaboration
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/186516
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/186516
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Hadrons
Gran Col·lisionador d'Hadrons
Física de partícules
Experiments
Large Hadron Collider (France and Switzerland)
Particle physics
Descripción
Sumario:A Dalitz plot analysis of B0 → ηc(1S)K +π− decays is performed using data samples of pp collisions collected with the LHCb detector at centre-of-mass energies of √s = 7, 8 and 13 TeV, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 4.7 fb−1. A satisfactory description of the data is obtained when including a contribution representing an exotic ηc(1S)π− resonant state. The significance of this exotic resonance is more than three standard deviations, while its mass and width are 4096 ± 20 +18 −22 MeV and 152±58 +60 −35 MeV, respectively. The spin-parity assignments J P = 0+ and J P = 1− are both consistent with the data. In addition, the first measurement of the B0 → ηc(1S)K +π− branching fraction is performed and gives B(B0→ ηc(1S)K +π−) = (5.73 ± 0.24 ± 0.13 ± 0.66) × 10−4, where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second systematic, and the third is due to limited knowledge of external branching fractions.