Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR

This article examines the role of adjacency claims in the development of a norm for the international protection of internally displaced persons (IDP s). Consistent with existing scholarship on adjacency claims, the construction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection was instrume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Bradley, Miriam
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/46675
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Adjacency claims
Internally displaced persons
International organizations
Refugees
UNHCR
id ES_4bfeeac22bb82811d07ee4df19cdc859
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/46675
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCRBradley, MiriamAdjacency claimsInternally displaced personsInternational organizationsRefugeesUNHCRThis article examines the role of adjacency claims in the development of a norm for the international protection of internally displaced persons (IDP s). Consistent with existing scholarship on adjacency claims, the construction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection was instrumental in garnering broad international acceptance of the IDP protection norm. However, these same analogies had an impact beyond the abstract acceptance of the norm. They were used to justify the expansion of the mandate of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) to encompass IDP s, and they shaped the way UNHCR understands and implements IDP protection. UNHCR replicated its policy approach from refugees to IDP s, generating a dysfunctional approach to IDP protection. Therefore, adjacency claims can have an effect beyond garnering support for new norms, and may result in suboptimal governance arrangements for implementing those norms.Brill Academic Publishers202120212019info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/46675http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésGlobal Governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. 2019 Dec;25(4):620-44© Brill Academic Publishers http://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/466752026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
title Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
spellingShingle Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
Bradley, Miriam
Adjacency claims
Internally displaced persons
International organizations
Refugees
UNHCR
title_short Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
title_full Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
title_fullStr Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
title_full_unstemmed Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
title_sort Unintended consequences of adjacency claims: the function and dysfunction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection in the work of UNHCR
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bradley, Miriam
author Bradley, Miriam
author_facet Bradley, Miriam
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Adjacency claims
Internally displaced persons
International organizations
Refugees
UNHCR
topic Adjacency claims
Internally displaced persons
International organizations
Refugees
UNHCR
description This article examines the role of adjacency claims in the development of a norm for the international protection of internally displaced persons (IDP s). Consistent with existing scholarship on adjacency claims, the construction of analogies between refugee protection and IDP protection was instrumental in garnering broad international acceptance of the IDP protection norm. However, these same analogies had an impact beyond the abstract acceptance of the norm. They were used to justify the expansion of the mandate of the UN Refugee Agency (UNHCR) to encompass IDP s, and they shaped the way UNHCR understands and implements IDP protection. UNHCR replicated its policy approach from refugees to IDP s, generating a dysfunctional approach to IDP protection. Therefore, adjacency claims can have an effect beyond garnering support for new norms, and may result in suboptimal governance arrangements for implementing those norms.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019
2021
2021
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion
format article
status_str acceptedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/46675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Global Governance: a review of multilateralism and international organizations. 2019 Dec;25(4):620-44
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv © Brill Academic Publishers http://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv © Brill Academic Publishers http://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-02504002
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill Academic Publishers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brill Academic Publishers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407598693842944
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia