Prioritizing interventions to reduce seismic vulnerability in school facilities in Colombia

Colombian seismic code NSR-98 establishes the requirement for t he seismic vulnerability analysis and, if necessary, the strengthening of public facilities (schools). Due to the investments required by risk reduction pr ograms, it is necessary to establish criteria for assigning priorities for th e...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Mora, Miguel G., Valcárcel Torres, Jairo Andrés, Cardona, Omar D., Pujades Beneit, Lluís|||0000-0002-2619-0805, Barbat Barbat, Horia Alejandro|||0000-0002-3649-8053, Bernal Granados, Gabriel Andres
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2015
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/86746
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/86746
https://dx.doi.org/10.1193/040412EQS151T
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Sismologia
Sismologia--Colombia
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Geotècnia::Sismologia
Descrição
Resumo:Colombian seismic code NSR-98 establishes the requirement for t he seismic vulnerability analysis and, if necessary, the strengthening of public facilities (schools). Due to the investments required by risk reduction pr ograms, it is necessary to establish criteria for assigning priorities for th e interventions. This article proposes a methodology for obtaining a Benefit-Cost Rat io (BCR) at the subnational level, by assessing the expected annual average los s of the built area of public schools and the retrofitting cost. The BCR is estimat ed as the difference between the estimates of the net present value for status quo a nd retrofitted states, these two divided by the retrofitting costs. According to the B CR, 47.3% of the total school built area of Colombia should be retrofitted where the retrofitting costs correspond to 25% of the total investment. Proposed BCR i s useful for prioritizing regions in functi on of the feasibility of reducing the seismic vulnerability of the schools.