Climate change skepticism of European farmers and implications for effective policy actions

European farmers struggle with mitigating global emissions of greenhouse gases effectively and to cope with climate change. European regulators and national governments encounter obstacles in implementing environmental policies, feeding frustration amongst farmers. We hypothesize that these issues r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Kröner , Lea, Van Grinsven , Hans, Erisman , Jan, Graversgaard , Morten, Immerzeel , Tim, Olesen , Jorgen, Soriano , Barbara, Sanz-Cobena , Alberto, Van Der Lippe , Tanja, Rodríguez Sánchez, Alfredo
Format: article
Publication Date:2025
Country:España
Institution:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repository:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/44268
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-02304-2
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02304-2
https://hdl.handle.net/10578/44268
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Climate change
Effective policy actions
European farmers
Skepticism
Description
Summary:European farmers struggle with mitigating global emissions of greenhouse gases effectively and to cope with climate change. European regulators and national governments encounter obstacles in implementing environmental policies, feeding frustration amongst farmers. We hypothesize that these issues relate to climate change skepticism within the farming community and dissensus with non-farmers and between countries. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed climate attribution and impact skepticism amongst farmers and the rest of the working population using the Eurobarometer and the European Social Survey, and national data about gross domestic product (GDP), innovativeness, share of agricultural land, and climate damage risk for agriculture. Impact skepticism of farmers increases with decreasing risk of climate damage and increasing GDP, causing a South-North gradient in Europe. The majority of farmers in the EU countries were more skeptical than non-farmers. Understanding and reducing this skepticism provides a key to more effective mitigation and adaptation.