Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models

Clinical relevance It is important to distinguish between visual acuity, optical quality and quality of vision when outcomes obtained with intraocular lenses are evaluated. These parameters, that includeobjective and subjective tests, should be assessed to obtain results that are not biased. Backgro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Poyales, Francisco, Garzon, Nuria, Rico del Viejo Miranza, Laura, Zhou, Ying, Millán Garcia-Varela, M. Sagrario|||0000-0001-6950-2373, Vega Lerín, Fidel|||0000-0002-8594-0872
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/364469
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/364469
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Intraocular lenses
Visual acuity
Quantity of vision
Optical quality
Visual qualit
Monofocal intraocular lens
Lents intraoculars
Agudesa visual
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió
id ES_4aa1dc88a33a2afcb2c633b5ae98a8a3
oai_identifier_str oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/364469
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens modelsPoyales, FranciscoGarzon, NuriaRico del Viejo Miranza, LauraZhou, YingMillán Garcia-Varela, M. Sagrario|||0000-0001-6950-2373Vega Lerín, Fidel|||0000-0002-8594-0872Intraocular lensesVisual acuityQuantity of visionOptical qualityVisual qualitMonofocal intraocular lensLents intraocularsAgudesa visualÀrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visióClinical relevance It is important to distinguish between visual acuity, optical quality and quality of vision when outcomes obtained with intraocular lenses are evaluated. These parameters, that includeobjective and subjective tests, should be assessed to obtain results that are not biased. Background To assess the difference in visual and optical quality between two monofocal intraocular lens models. Methods : This was a prospective, parallel and randomised clinical study conducted at Miranza IOA, a private clinic in Madrid, Spain. Sixty patients were implanted bilaterally, 30 per group, with two aspheric IOLs with induced spherical aberration of -0.27 µm for Group A and -0.20 µm for Group B. Visual outcomes obtained at 1 and 3 months after surgery included both uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected monocular distance visual acuity (DCVA), objective scattering index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, Strehl Ratio (SR), contrast sensitivity defocus curve (CSDC), intraocular lens spherical aberration (SA), and longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye. Activity limitations in daily life were assessed using CatQuest-9SF questionnaire. Results There were statistically significant differences for DCVA (0.04 LogMAR; p = .008) and SR (0.03; p = .003) between groups. Outcomes related to CSDC showed statistically significant differences for vergences between -0.50 D and +1.00 D (3 mm pupil) and for vergences of 0.00 D and +0.50 D (4.5 mm pupil) between groups. Overall, Group A showed better results regarding visual and optical quality, including a lower longitudinal chromatic aberration result in comparison to Group B. Patient satisfaction evaluated with CatQuest-9SF showed that Group A achieved better outcomes, although the differences were statistically significant only for the ‘Reading text on television’ item (p = 0.027). Conclusions Both intraocular lens models showed excellent quantity of vision, optical and visual quality as well as high patient satisfaction. Despite this, the the Group A model provided slightly better outcomes than the Group B model.This study was partially funded by an unrestricted research grant from Johnson and Johnson Vision.Peer ReviewedTaylor & Francis20212021-12-0720222022-03-17journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501AMhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2117/364469https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737reponame:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPCinstname:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)InglésengAgencia Estatal de Investigación http://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 PID2020-114582RB-I00 IMPLANTES OPTICOS INTRAOCULARES CORRECTORES DE LA PRESBICIA PARA UNA COMPENSACION VISUAL PERSONALIZADAopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/3644692026-05-27T15:37:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
title Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
spellingShingle Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
Poyales, Francisco
Intraocular lenses
Visual acuity
Quantity of vision
Optical quality
Visual qualit
Monofocal intraocular lens
Lents intraoculars
Agudesa visual
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió
title_short Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
title_full Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
title_fullStr Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
title_sort Comparison of visual performance between two aspheric monofocal intraocular lens models
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Poyales, Francisco
Garzon, Nuria
Rico del Viejo Miranza, Laura
Zhou, Ying
Millán Garcia-Varela, M. Sagrario|||0000-0001-6950-2373
Vega Lerín, Fidel|||0000-0002-8594-0872
author Poyales, Francisco
author_facet Poyales, Francisco
Garzon, Nuria
Rico del Viejo Miranza, Laura
Zhou, Ying
Millán Garcia-Varela, M. Sagrario|||0000-0001-6950-2373
Vega Lerín, Fidel|||0000-0002-8594-0872
author_role author
author2 Garzon, Nuria
Rico del Viejo Miranza, Laura
Zhou, Ying
Millán Garcia-Varela, M. Sagrario|||0000-0001-6950-2373
Vega Lerín, Fidel|||0000-0002-8594-0872
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Intraocular lenses
Visual acuity
Quantity of vision
Optical quality
Visual qualit
Monofocal intraocular lens
Lents intraoculars
Agudesa visual
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió
topic Intraocular lenses
Visual acuity
Quantity of vision
Optical quality
Visual qualit
Monofocal intraocular lens
Lents intraoculars
Agudesa visual
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Ciències de la visió
description Clinical relevance It is important to distinguish between visual acuity, optical quality and quality of vision when outcomes obtained with intraocular lenses are evaluated. These parameters, that includeobjective and subjective tests, should be assessed to obtain results that are not biased. Background To assess the difference in visual and optical quality between two monofocal intraocular lens models. Methods : This was a prospective, parallel and randomised clinical study conducted at Miranza IOA, a private clinic in Madrid, Spain. Sixty patients were implanted bilaterally, 30 per group, with two aspheric IOLs with induced spherical aberration of -0.27 µm for Group A and -0.20 µm for Group B. Visual outcomes obtained at 1 and 3 months after surgery included both uncorrected (UCVA) and corrected monocular distance visual acuity (DCVA), objective scattering index (OSI), modulation transfer function (MTF) cut-off, Strehl Ratio (SR), contrast sensitivity defocus curve (CSDC), intraocular lens spherical aberration (SA), and longitudinal chromatic aberration of the eye. Activity limitations in daily life were assessed using CatQuest-9SF questionnaire. Results There were statistically significant differences for DCVA (0.04 LogMAR; p = .008) and SR (0.03; p = .003) between groups. Outcomes related to CSDC showed statistically significant differences for vergences between -0.50 D and +1.00 D (3 mm pupil) and for vergences of 0.00 D and +0.50 D (4.5 mm pupil) between groups. Overall, Group A showed better results regarding visual and optical quality, including a lower longitudinal chromatic aberration result in comparison to Group B. Patient satisfaction evaluated with CatQuest-9SF showed that Group A achieved better outcomes, although the differences were statistically significant only for the ‘Reading text on television’ item (p = 0.027). Conclusions Both intraocular lens models showed excellent quantity of vision, optical and visual quality as well as high patient satisfaction. Despite this, the the Group A model provided slightly better outcomes than the Group B model.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-12-07
2022
2022-03-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
AM
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2117/364469
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737
url https://hdl.handle.net/2117/364469
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08164622.2021.2009737
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Agencia Estatal de Investigación http://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033 Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020 PID2020-114582RB-I00 IMPLANTES OPTICOS INTRAOCULARES CORRECTORES DE LA PRESBICIA PARA UNA COMPENSACION VISUAL PERSONALIZADA
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
instname:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
instname_str Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
reponame_str UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
collection UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407506736873472
score 15.300719

Similares en LA Referencia