Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today

Building on a recent co-edited work (Dann and Liebman Parrinello, 2009), this account seeks to demonstrate that tourism studies as a field has been unjustifiably dominated by English speakers. The point is illustrated firstly in terms of its four major theories that claim to have their origin in the...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Dann, Graham M. S.
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2011
País:España
Recursos:Universidad de Huelva (UHU)
Repositorio:Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/5234
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10272/5234
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Anglophone hegemony
Major tourism theories
Research centres
Book publishers
International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research
id ES_4a5243db9e95178fb3b8d13bc8f30ff6
oai_identifier_str oai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/5234
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie todayDann, Graham M. S.Anglophone hegemonyMajor tourism theoriesResearch centresBook publishersInternational Centre for Tourism Studies and ResearchBuilding on a recent co-edited work (Dann and Liebman Parrinello, 2009), this account seeks to demonstrate that tourism studies as a field has been unjustifiably dominated by English speakers. The point is illustrated firstly in terms of its four major theories that claim to have their origin in the Anglophone world of the 70s in spite of the realisation that they had their antecedents in Continental Europe of the 30s. Objective statistical measures from the electronic files of the Centre International de Recherches et d’Études Touristiques (International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research) (CIRET) are then provided in order to reconfirm this linguistic dominance. These include recent data that relate to researchers, research centres, book publishers and journals. Finally a brief complementary analysis is undertaken of the subjective dimension of such hegemony by examining the phenomenon of self-reflexivity in a number of leading tourism scholarsSobre la base de un trabajo recientemente coeditado (Dann and Liebman Parrinello, 2009), este informe busca demostrar que los estudios sobre turismo como campo ha sido injustificablemente dominado por hablantes de lengua inglesa. Este punto es ilustrado primer lugar en términos de sus cuatro mayores teorías que afirman tener su origen en el mundo anglófono de los años 70 a pesar del hecho de que tenían sus antecedentes en la Europa Continental de los años 30. Objetivas medidas estadísticas de los archivos electrónicos de el Centro Internacional de Investigación y de estudios turísticos (CIRET) son después añadidas para reconfirmar esta dominancia lingüística. Estas incluyen datos recientes que se relacionan con los investigadores, centros de investigación, libros publicados y revistas. Finalmente, un breve análisis complementario es abordado de la dimensión subjetiva de tal hegemonía mediante el examen de el fenómeno de auto reflexividad en una serie de destacados estudios de turismo.Universidad de Huelva20112011-01-0120112011-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10272/5234reponame:Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelvainstname:Universidad de Huelva (UHU)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 Españahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ariasmontano.uhu.es:10272/52342026-06-02T14:58:11Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
title Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
spellingShingle Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
Dann, Graham M. S.
Anglophone hegemony
Major tourism theories
Research centres
Book publishers
International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research
title_short Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
title_full Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
title_fullStr Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
title_full_unstemmed Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
title_sort Anglophone hegemony in tourims studie today
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Dann, Graham M. S.
author Dann, Graham M. S.
author_facet Dann, Graham M. S.
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Anglophone hegemony
Major tourism theories
Research centres
Book publishers
International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research
topic Anglophone hegemony
Major tourism theories
Research centres
Book publishers
International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research
description Building on a recent co-edited work (Dann and Liebman Parrinello, 2009), this account seeks to demonstrate that tourism studies as a field has been unjustifiably dominated by English speakers. The point is illustrated firstly in terms of its four major theories that claim to have their origin in the Anglophone world of the 70s in spite of the realisation that they had their antecedents in Continental Europe of the 30s. Objective statistical measures from the electronic files of the Centre International de Recherches et d’Études Touristiques (International Centre for Tourism Studies and Research) (CIRET) are then provided in order to reconfirm this linguistic dominance. These include recent data that relate to researchers, research centres, book publishers and journals. Finally a brief complementary analysis is undertaken of the subjective dimension of such hegemony by examining the phenomenon of self-reflexivity in a number of leading tourism scholars
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011
2011-01-01
2011
2011-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10272/5234
url http://hdl.handle.net/10272/5234
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Huelva
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad de Huelva
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
instname:Universidad de Huelva (UHU)
instname_str Universidad de Huelva (UHU)
reponame_str Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
collection Arias Montano. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Huelva
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407478328852480
score 15.811543

Registos relacionados