Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.

Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the perception of the patient, the chairside time, and the reliability and/or reproducibility of intraoral scanners for full arch in pediatric patients. Methods: A data search was performed in four databases (Medline-Pubmed, Scopus, ProQuest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Serrano-Velasco, Diego, Martín-Vacas, Andrea, Paz-Cortés, Marta M., Giovannini, Giovanni|||/items/c0e76f34-7845-4e2f-94ef-ac6d8d098a12, Cintora-López , Patricia, Aragonese, Juan Manuel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
Repositorio:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:archive.uax.com:20.500.12080/55906
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/55906
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Consultorios odontológicos
Flujo digital
Escáner intraoral
Ortodoncia
Odontopediatría
id ES_4a2ef3e719f993228eb2427e47dbc7fb
oai_identifier_str oai:archive.uax.com:20.500.12080/55906
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.Serrano-Velasco, DiegoMartín-Vacas, AndreaPaz-Cortés, Marta M.Giovannini, Giovanni|||/items/c0e76f34-7845-4e2f-94ef-ac6d8d098a12Cintora-López , PatriciaAragonese, Juan ManuelConsultorios odontológicosFlujo digitalEscáner intraoralOrtodonciaOdontopediatríaPurpose: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the perception of the patient, the chairside time, and the reliability and/or reproducibility of intraoral scanners for full arch in pediatric patients. Methods: A data search was performed in four databases (Medline-Pubmed, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science) in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statements. Studies were classified in three categories (patient perception, scanning or impression time and reliability and/or reproducibility). The resources, the data extraction and the quality assessment were carried out independently by two operators. The variables recorded were population characteristics, material and methods aspects and included country, study design and main conclusion. A quality assessment of the selected studies was performed with QUADAS-2 tool, and Kappa-Cohen Index was calculated to analyze examiner agreement. Results: The initial search obtained 681 publications, and finally four studies matching inclusion criteria were selected. The distribution of the studies in the categories was three for the analysis of the patient's perception and scanning or impression time; and two items to assess the reliability and/or reproducibility of intraoral scans. All included studies have a repeated measures-transversal design. The sample size ranged between 26 and 59 children with a mean age. The intraoral scanners evaluated were Lava C.O.S, Cerec Omnicam, TRIOS Classic, TRIOS 3-Cart and TRIOS Ortho. The quality assessment of the studies using QUADAS-2 tool revealed a low risk of bias while evaluating patient perception, but an unclear risk of bias in the analysis of accuracy or chairside time. In relation to the applicability concerns, the patient selection was of high risk of bias. All studies agreed that the patient perception and comfort is better with intraoral scanners in comparison with the conventional method. The accuracy or reliability of the digital procedure is not clear, being clinically acceptable. In relation with the chairside time, it depends on the intraoral scanner, with contradictory data in the different analyzed studies. Conclusion: The use of intraoral scanners in children is a favorable option, finding a significantly higher patient perception and comfort with intraoral scanners compared to the conventional impression method. The evidence for reliability or reproducibility is not strong to date, however, the differences between the intraoral measurements and the digital models would be clinically acceptable.FrontiersUAX -Campus MadridUAX Archive20232023-01-0120232023-01-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/55906reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabioinstname:Universidad Alfonso X el SabioInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Attribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:archive.uax.com:20.500.12080/559062026-05-28T12:40:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
title Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
spellingShingle Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
Serrano-Velasco, Diego
Consultorios odontológicos
Flujo digital
Escáner intraoral
Ortodoncia
Odontopediatría
title_short Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
title_full Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
title_fullStr Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
title_sort Intraoral scanners in children: evaluation of the patient perception, reliability and reproducibility, and chairside time-A systematic review.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Serrano-Velasco, Diego
Martín-Vacas, Andrea
Paz-Cortés, Marta M.
Giovannini, Giovanni|||/items/c0e76f34-7845-4e2f-94ef-ac6d8d098a12
Cintora-López , Patricia
Aragonese, Juan Manuel
author Serrano-Velasco, Diego
author_facet Serrano-Velasco, Diego
Martín-Vacas, Andrea
Paz-Cortés, Marta M.
Giovannini, Giovanni|||/items/c0e76f34-7845-4e2f-94ef-ac6d8d098a12
Cintora-López , Patricia
Aragonese, Juan Manuel
author_role author
author2 Martín-Vacas, Andrea
Paz-Cortés, Marta M.
Giovannini, Giovanni|||/items/c0e76f34-7845-4e2f-94ef-ac6d8d098a12
Cintora-López , Patricia
Aragonese, Juan Manuel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv UAX -Campus Madrid
UAX Archive
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Consultorios odontológicos
Flujo digital
Escáner intraoral
Ortodoncia
Odontopediatría
topic Consultorios odontológicos
Flujo digital
Escáner intraoral
Ortodoncia
Odontopediatría
description Purpose: The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the perception of the patient, the chairside time, and the reliability and/or reproducibility of intraoral scanners for full arch in pediatric patients. Methods: A data search was performed in four databases (Medline-Pubmed, Scopus, ProQuest and Web of Science) in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 statements. Studies were classified in three categories (patient perception, scanning or impression time and reliability and/or reproducibility). The resources, the data extraction and the quality assessment were carried out independently by two operators. The variables recorded were population characteristics, material and methods aspects and included country, study design and main conclusion. A quality assessment of the selected studies was performed with QUADAS-2 tool, and Kappa-Cohen Index was calculated to analyze examiner agreement. Results: The initial search obtained 681 publications, and finally four studies matching inclusion criteria were selected. The distribution of the studies in the categories was three for the analysis of the patient's perception and scanning or impression time; and two items to assess the reliability and/or reproducibility of intraoral scans. All included studies have a repeated measures-transversal design. The sample size ranged between 26 and 59 children with a mean age. The intraoral scanners evaluated were Lava C.O.S, Cerec Omnicam, TRIOS Classic, TRIOS 3-Cart and TRIOS Ortho. The quality assessment of the studies using QUADAS-2 tool revealed a low risk of bias while evaluating patient perception, but an unclear risk of bias in the analysis of accuracy or chairside time. In relation to the applicability concerns, the patient selection was of high risk of bias. All studies agreed that the patient perception and comfort is better with intraoral scanners in comparison with the conventional method. The accuracy or reliability of the digital procedure is not clear, being clinically acceptable. In relation with the chairside time, it depends on the intraoral scanner, with contradictory data in the different analyzed studies. Conclusion: The use of intraoral scanners in children is a favorable option, finding a significantly higher patient perception and comfort with intraoral scanners compared to the conventional impression method. The evidence for reliability or reproducibility is not strong to date, however, the differences between the intraoral measurements and the digital models would be clinically acceptable.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2023-01-01
2023
2023-01-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/55906
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12080/55906
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
instname:Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
instname_str Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
reponame_str Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
collection Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407469845872640
score 15.812429