Prisión permanente revisable, concurrencia de delitos y acumulación de penas
Eight years after its entry into force, sentences to life imprisonment subject to review continue to occur, highlighting the issues stemming from the deficient legislative technique employed by the legislator in 2015. One of the most overlooked aspects, yet posing significant challenges in practice,...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha |
| Repositorio: | RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/46309 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.5944/rdpc.ENERO.2024 https://revistas.uned.es/index.php/RDPC/issue/view/1765 https://hdl.handle.net/10578/46309 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | concurrencia de delitos concurrent offenses judicial and penitentiary liquidation procedures life imprisonment with parole review penas de prisión prisión permanente revisable prison sentence procedimiento de liquidación judicial y penitenciaria |
| Resumo: | Eight years after its entry into force, sentences to life imprisonment subject to review continue to occur, highlighting the issues stemming from the deficient legislative technique employed by the legislator in 2015. One of the most overlooked aspects, yet posing significant challenges in practice, is the determination of the sentence effectively to be served, through judicial and penitentiary liquidation procedures that aim to establish a unified penalty subject to the scientific individualization system outlined by the General Penitentiary Organic Law. The Constitutional Court (TC), in the controversial ruling 169/2021, has built the constitutionality of this penalty around the said system. This work analyzes the problems arising in the penalty liquidation procedures, particularly in cases involving the concurrent application of life imprisonment subject to review and other custodial sentences. |
|---|