Quantitative structure fate relationships for multimedia environmental analysis

Key physicochemical properties for a wide spectrum of chemical pollutants are unknown. This thesis analyses the prospect of assessing the environmental distribution of chemicals directly from supervised learning algorithms using molecular descriptors, rather than from multimedia environmental models...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Martínez Brito, Izacar Jesús
Tipo de recurso: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2010
País:España
Institución:CBUC, CESCA
Repositorio:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
OAI Identifier:oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/8590
Acceso en línea:http://www.tdx.cat/TDX-0825110-122638
http://hdl.handle.net/10803/8590
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:principal component analysis(PCA)
physicochemical properties
multimedia environmental model (MEM)
molecular descriptors
fate estimations
domain of applicability(DOA)
supervised learning algorithms
self organizing map(SOM)
radial basis function(RBF)
quantitative stucture-fate relationship(QSFR)
quantitative property-fate relationship(QPFR)
support vector regression(SVR)
uncertainty analysis
unsupervised learning algorithms
artificial neural network(ANN)
backpropagation network(BPN)
504
62
Descripción
Sumario:Key physicochemical properties for a wide spectrum of chemical pollutants are unknown. This thesis analyses the prospect of assessing the environmental distribution of chemicals directly from supervised learning algorithms using molecular descriptors, rather than from multimedia environmental models (MEMs) using several physicochemical properties estimated from QSARs. Dimensionless compartmental mass ratios of 468 validation chemicals were compared, in logarithmic units, between: a) SimpleBox 3, a Level III MEM, propagating random property values within statistical distributions of widely recommended QSARs; and, b) Support Vector Regressions (SVRs), acting as Quantitative Structure-Fate Relationships (QSFRs), linking mass ratios to molecular weight and constituent counts (atoms, bonds, functional groups and rings) for training chemicals. Best predictions were obtained for test and validation chemicals optimally found to be within the domain of applicability of the QSFRs, evidenced by low MAE and high q2 values (in air, MAE≤0.54 and q2≥0.92; in water, MAE≤0.27 and q2≥0.92).