Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach

Objectives To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.Methods A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the Europe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Guerra-Paiva S, Carrillo I, Mira J, Fernandes J, Strametz R, Gil-Hernández E, Sousa P
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
Repositorio:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
OAI Identifier:oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p17701
Acceso en línea:https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17701
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:patient safety
second victim
programs
evaluation
indicators
id ES_4864e1507fe6a3d67d0ecdd47f144fb5
oai_identifier_str oai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p17701
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus ApproachGuerra-Paiva SCarrillo IMira JFernandes JStrametz RGil-Hernández ESousa Ppatient safetysecond victimprogramsevaluationindicatorsObjectives To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.Methods A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.Results From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.Conclusion This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.FRONTIERS MEDIA SA2024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17701International Journal of Public HealthISSN: 16618556ISSNe: 16618564reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científicainstname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:fisabio.fundanetsuite.com:p177012026-06-11T12:45:17Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
title Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
spellingShingle Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
Guerra-Paiva S
patient safety
second victim
programs
evaluation
indicators
title_short Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
title_full Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
title_fullStr Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
title_full_unstemmed Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
title_sort Developing Core Indicators for Evaluating Second Victim Programs: An International Consensus Approach
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Guerra-Paiva S
Carrillo I
Mira J
Fernandes J
Strametz R
Gil-Hernández E
Sousa P
author Guerra-Paiva S
author_facet Guerra-Paiva S
Carrillo I
Mira J
Fernandes J
Strametz R
Gil-Hernández E
Sousa P
author_role author
author2 Carrillo I
Mira J
Fernandes J
Strametz R
Gil-Hernández E
Sousa P
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv patient safety
second victim
programs
evaluation
indicators
topic patient safety
second victim
programs
evaluation
indicators
description Objectives To establish a consensus for evaluating second victims (SV) support interventions to facilitate comparison over time and across different organizations.Methods A three-phase qualitative study was conducted from June 2023 to March 2024. This consensus approach engaged members of the European Researchers Network Working on Second Victims. A nominal group technique and insights from a scoping review were used to create a questionnaire for Delphi Rounds. Indicators were rated 1-5, aiming for agreement if over 70% of participants rated an indicator as feasible and sensitive with scores above 4, followed by a consensus conference.Results From an initial set of 113 indicators, 59 were assessed online, with 35 advancing to the Delphi rounds. Two Delphi rounds were conducted, achieving response rates of over 60% and 80% respectively, resulting in consensus on 11 indicators for evaluating SV support programs. These indicators encompass awareness and activation, outcomes of SV support programs, as well as training offered by the institution.Conclusion This study presents a scoreboard for designing and monitoring SV support programs, as well as measuring standardized outcomes in future research.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17701
url https://fisabio.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/17701
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International Journal of Public Health
ISSN: 16618556
ISSNe: 16618564
reponame:r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
instname:Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
instname_str Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana (FISABIO)
reponame_str r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
collection r-FISABIO. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407357218324480
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia