Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.

BACKGROUND: An earlier analysis of the PEARL phase III study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) over capecitabine in aromatase inhibitor-resistant, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Martín M, Zielinski C, Ruiz-Borrego M, Carrasco E, Ciruelos EM, Muñoz M, Bermejo B, Margelí M, Csöszi T, Antón A, Turner N, Casas MI, Morales S, Alba E, Calvo L, de la Haba-Rodríguez J, Ramos M, Murillo L, Santaballa A, Alonso-Romero JL, Sánchez-Rovira P, Corsaro M, Huang X, Thallinger C, Kahan Z, Gil-Gil M
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:INCLIVA
Repositorio:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
OAI Identifier:oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p16586
Acceso en línea:https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16586
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:CDK4/6 inhibitor
Capecitabine
Endocrine therapy
HER2–negative
Hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
Overall survival
Palbociclib
id ES_4786228aaa1c8d855b5aed8b1d92c070
oai_identifier_str oai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p16586
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.Martín MZielinski CRuiz-Borrego MCarrasco ECiruelos EMMuñoz MBermejo BMargelí MCsöszi TAntón ATurner NCasas MIMorales SAlba ECalvo Lde la Haba-Rodríguez JRamos MMurillo LSantaballa AAlonso-Romero JLSánchez-Rovira PCorsaro MHuang XThallinger CKahan ZGil-Gil MCDK4/6 inhibitorCapecitabineEndocrine therapyHER2–negativeHormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancerOverall survivalPalbociclibBACKGROUND: An earlier analysis of the PEARL phase III study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) over capecitabine in aromatase inhibitor-resistant, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients (N = 601) were randomized 1:1 to capecitabine or palbociclib plus ET (exemestane, Cohort 1; fulvestrant, Cohort 2). OS was analysed in Cohort 2, the wild-type ESR1 population and the overall population. Additionally, we analysed subsequent systemic therapies and explored PFS2 (time from randomization to the end of the first subsequent therapy/death). RESULTS: OS was 31.1 months for palbociclib plus fulvestrant and 32.8 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.50, P = 0.550). In the wild-type ESR1 population, OS was 37.2 months for palbociclib plus ET and 34.8 months for capecitabine (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81-1.37, P = 0.683). In OS analyses, no subgroup showed superiority for palbociclib plus ET over capecitabine. OS in the overall population was 32.6 months for palbociclib plus ET and 30.9 months for capecitabine (P = 0.995). Subsequent systemic therapy was given to 79.8% and 82.9% of patients with palbociclib plus ET and capecitabine, respectively. Median PFS2 was similar between study arms (Cohort 2, P = 0.941; wild-type ESR1 population, P = 0.827). No new safety findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Palbociclib plus ET did not show a statistically superior OS compared to capecitabine in MBC patients progressing on aromatase inhibitors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov), 2013-003170-27 (EudraCT).ELSEVIER SCI LTD2022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16586EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCERISSN: 09598049ISSNe: 18790852reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVAinstname:INCLIVAInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:incliva.fundanetsuite.com:p165862026-06-07T16:35:31Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
title Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
spellingShingle Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
Martín M
CDK4/6 inhibitor
Capecitabine
Endocrine therapy
HER2–negative
Hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
Overall survival
Palbociclib
title_short Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
title_full Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
title_fullStr Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
title_full_unstemmed Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
title_sort Overall survival with palbociclib plus endocrine therapy versus capecitabine in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the PEARL study.
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Martín M
Zielinski C
Ruiz-Borrego M
Carrasco E
Ciruelos EM
Muñoz M
Bermejo B
Margelí M
Csöszi T
Antón A
Turner N
Casas MI
Morales S
Alba E
Calvo L
de la Haba-Rodríguez J
Ramos M
Murillo L
Santaballa A
Alonso-Romero JL
Sánchez-Rovira P
Corsaro M
Huang X
Thallinger C
Kahan Z
Gil-Gil M
author Martín M
author_facet Martín M
Zielinski C
Ruiz-Borrego M
Carrasco E
Ciruelos EM
Muñoz M
Bermejo B
Margelí M
Csöszi T
Antón A
Turner N
Casas MI
Morales S
Alba E
Calvo L
de la Haba-Rodríguez J
Ramos M
Murillo L
Santaballa A
Alonso-Romero JL
Sánchez-Rovira P
Corsaro M
Huang X
Thallinger C
Kahan Z
Gil-Gil M
author_role author
author2 Zielinski C
Ruiz-Borrego M
Carrasco E
Ciruelos EM
Muñoz M
Bermejo B
Margelí M
Csöszi T
Antón A
Turner N
Casas MI
Morales S
Alba E
Calvo L
de la Haba-Rodríguez J
Ramos M
Murillo L
Santaballa A
Alonso-Romero JL
Sánchez-Rovira P
Corsaro M
Huang X
Thallinger C
Kahan Z
Gil-Gil M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CDK4/6 inhibitor
Capecitabine
Endocrine therapy
HER2–negative
Hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
Overall survival
Palbociclib
topic CDK4/6 inhibitor
Capecitabine
Endocrine therapy
HER2–negative
Hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer
Overall survival
Palbociclib
description BACKGROUND: An earlier analysis of the PEARL phase III study showed that palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) does not improve progression-free survival (PFS) over capecitabine in aromatase inhibitor-resistant, hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. Here, we report the final overall survival (OS) analysis. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients (N = 601) were randomized 1:1 to capecitabine or palbociclib plus ET (exemestane, Cohort 1; fulvestrant, Cohort 2). OS was analysed in Cohort 2, the wild-type ESR1 population and the overall population. Additionally, we analysed subsequent systemic therapies and explored PFS2 (time from randomization to the end of the first subsequent therapy/death). RESULTS: OS was 31.1 months for palbociclib plus fulvestrant and 32.8 months for capecitabine (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81-1.50, P = 0.550). In the wild-type ESR1 population, OS was 37.2 months for palbociclib plus ET and 34.8 months for capecitabine (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81-1.37, P = 0.683). In OS analyses, no subgroup showed superiority for palbociclib plus ET over capecitabine. OS in the overall population was 32.6 months for palbociclib plus ET and 30.9 months for capecitabine (P = 0.995). Subsequent systemic therapy was given to 79.8% and 82.9% of patients with palbociclib plus ET and capecitabine, respectively. Median PFS2 was similar between study arms (Cohort 2, P = 0.941; wild-type ESR1 population, P = 0.827). No new safety findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Palbociclib plus ET did not show a statistically superior OS compared to capecitabine in MBC patients progressing on aromatase inhibitors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02028507 (ClinTrials.gov), 2013-003170-27 (EudraCT).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16586
url https://incliva.portalinvestigacion.com/publicaciones/16586
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER SCI LTD
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ELSEVIER SCI LTD
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN: 09598049
ISSNe: 18790852
reponame:r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
instname:INCLIVA
instname_str INCLIVA
reponame_str r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
collection r-INCLIVA. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica de INCLIVA
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407300149575680
score 15,811543