La relación argumentación-(des)cortesía en el discurso persuasivo
This work focuses on the relation established between argumentation and (im)politenessin discourse. My purpose is to demonstrate that the argumentative structure can operate as a resource to serve as regulator of the speakers’ face as well as, at another level, a resource which reinforces (im)polite...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/74085 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/74085 https://doi.org/10.1515/soprag-2014-0008 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Argumentación Persuasión Imagen social Actividad de imagen (Des)cortesía Argumentation Persuasion Face Face work (Im)politeness |
| Sumario: | This work focuses on the relation established between argumentation and (im)politenessin discourse. My purpose is to demonstrate that the argumentative structure can operate as a resource to serve as regulator of the speakers’ face as well as, at another level, a resource which reinforces (im)polite activity. Previous studies have showed the persuasive function of (im)politeness, and for this reason the (im)polite acthas been considered as a resource “in the service of” argument . In this paper, I aim to show that the relation between argumentation and (im)politenessis not unidirectional. This means in turn that, in some types of discourse the argumentative structure can be used for producing (im)politeness, regardless of the persuasive goal that, in my opinion, is present in any kind of discourse to a higher or lesser degree. In this way I propose a bi-functional relation between argumentation and (im)politeness. For proving this proposal, persuasive texts, mainly advertising and political texts, are used. |
|---|