Failure-free survival of the Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead after a very long-term follow-up

Aims: Riata® implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads from St. Jude Medical are prone to malfunction. This study aimed to describe the rate of this lead's malfunction in a very long-term follow-up. Methods: This single-centre observational study included 50 patients who received a Ria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: San Antonio, Rodolfo, Guasch i Casany, Eduard, Chipa Ccasani, Fredy, Apolo, José, Pujol López, Margarida, Fernandez, Hael, Trotta, Omar, Niebla Bellido, Mireia, Borràs, Roger, Trucco, Emilce, Arbelo, Elena, Roca Luque, Ivo, Brugada Terradellas, Josep, 1958-, Mont Girbau, Lluís, Tolosana, José M. (José María)
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:2445/162063
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/162063
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Desfibril·ladors cardioversors implantables
Productes defectuosos
Plom
Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators
Defects in manufactures
Lead
Descripción
Sumario:Aims: Riata® implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads from St. Jude Medical are prone to malfunction. This study aimed to describe the rate of this lead's malfunction in a very long-term follow-up. Methods: This single-centre observational study included 50 patients who received a Riata 7Fr dual-coil lead between 2003 and 2008. Follow-up was conducted both in person and remotely, and analysed at 8-month intervals. We evaluated the rates of cable externalization (CE), electrical failure (EF), and the interaction of these two complications. Structural lead failure was defined as radiographic CE. Oversensing of non-cardiac signal or sudden changes in impedance, sensing, or pacing thresholds constituted EF. Results: During a mean follow-up of 10.2 ± 2.9 years, 16 patients (32%) died. We observed lead malfunction in 13 patients (26%): three (23%) due to CE, six (46%) to EF and four (31%) to both complications. Of the malfunctioning leads, 77% failed after seven years of follow-up. The incidence rate (IR) of overall malfunction per 100 patients per year was 0.9 during the first seven years post-implantation, increased to 7.0 after the 7th year and more than doubled (to 16.7) after 10 years. Beyond seven years post-implantation, IR per 100 patient-years increased in both EF and CE (from 0.6 to 5.6 vs. 0.3 to 4.2, respectively). Presence of CE was associated with a 4-fold increase in the proportion of EF. Conclusion: The incidence of Riata ICD lead malfunction, both for EF and CE, increased dramatically after seven years and then more than doubled after 10 years post-implantation.