Solving dependability/performability irreducible Markov models using regenerative randomization
Markov models are commonly used to asses the dependability/performability of fault-tolerant systems. Computation of many dependability/performability measures for repairable fault-tolerant systems requires the transient analysis of irreducible Markov models. Examples of such measures are the unavail...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2003 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/19945 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/19945 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Fault-tolerant computing Tolerància als errors (Informàtica) Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Estadística matemàtica |
| Sumario: | Markov models are commonly used to asses the dependability/performability of fault-tolerant systems. Computation of many dependability/performability measures for repairable fault-tolerant systems requires the transient analysis of irreducible Markov models. Examples of such measures are the unavailability at time t and the expected interval unavailability at time t. Randomization (also called uniformization) is a well-known Markov transient analysis method and has good properties: numerical stability, well-controlled computation error, and ability to specify the computation error in advance. However, the randomization method is computationally expensive when the model is stiff, as is the case for Markov models of repairable fault-tolerant systems when the mission time of interest is large. Steady-state detection is a technique recently proposed to speedup randomization when the model is irreducible. This paper points out that another method, regenerative randomization, which has the same good properties as randomization, also covers irreducible models, and compares, for the important class of irreducible failure/repair models with exponential failure and repair time distributions and repair in every state with failed components, the efficiency of the regenerative randomization method with that of randomization with steady-state detection. In the frequent case in which the initial state is the state without failed components the regenerative randomization method can be faster than randomization with steady-state detection, specially when the model is large and the failure rates are much smaller than the repair rates. For other initial probability distributions, the regenerative randomization method seems to perform worse than randomization with steady-state detection. |
|---|