Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019

The NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s mar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rodrigo Carranza, Víctor, González-Mohíno Mayoralas, Fernando, Santos Concejero, Jordan, Santos del Cerro, Jesús, González Ravé, José María
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
Repositorio:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
OAI Identifier:oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/39719
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10578/39719
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Men’s marathon
Shoe technology
id ES_45bc7e0afd55d6d1bed5cbdd4f78f3c2
oai_identifier_str oai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/39719
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019Rodrigo Carranza, VíctorGonzález-Mohíno Mayoralas, FernandoSantos Concejero, JordanSantos del Cerro, JesúsGonzález Ravé, José MaríaMen’s marathonShoe technologyThe NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s marathon performance, (ii) to analyse whether the changes in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind) and orography of the marathons, age and birthplace of the runners has changed from 2015 to 2019 and (iii) to analyse the impact of NAST on the historical 50 best performances. Data from top-100 men's marathon performances were collected in that timeframe. The shoes used by the athletes were identified (in 91.8% of the cases) by publicly available photographs. External and environmental conditions of each marathon and age and birthplace of the runners were also analysed. Marathon performances improved from 2017 onwards between 0.75 and 1.50% compared to 2015 and 2016 (p < 0.05). In addition, the improvement was greater in the upper deciles than in the lower ones (p < 0.001). Runners wearing NAST ran ~ 1% faster in marathon compared to runners that did not use it (p < 0.001). When conducting an individual analysis of athletes who ran with and without NAST, 72.5% of the athletes who completed a marathon wearing NAST improved their performance by 0.68% (p < 0.01). External and environmental conditions, age or birthplace of runners seems not to have influenced this performance improvement. NAST has had a clear impact on marathon performance unchanged in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind), orography, age, and birthplace of the runners but with differences between venues.Springer Nature202420242021info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10578/39719reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLMinstname:Universidad de Castilla-La ManchaInglésinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:ruidera.uclm.es:10578/397192026-05-27T07:36:41Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
spellingShingle Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
Rodrigo Carranza, Víctor
Men’s marathon
Shoe technology
title_short Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_full Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_fullStr Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
title_sort Infuence of advanced shoe technology on the top 100 annual performances in men’s marathon from 2015 to 2019
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodrigo Carranza, Víctor
González-Mohíno Mayoralas, Fernando
Santos Concejero, Jordan
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
González Ravé, José María
author Rodrigo Carranza, Víctor
author_facet Rodrigo Carranza, Víctor
González-Mohíno Mayoralas, Fernando
Santos Concejero, Jordan
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
González Ravé, José María
author_role author
author2 González-Mohíno Mayoralas, Fernando
Santos Concejero, Jordan
Santos del Cerro, Jesús
González Ravé, José María
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Men’s marathon
Shoe technology
topic Men’s marathon
Shoe technology
description The NIKE Vaporfly shoe was introduced in May 2017 as part of the original #Breaking2 Project (an event aimed to run the first marathon under 2 h). This new advanced shoe technology (NAST) changed the footwear design conception. The aim of this study was (i) to analyse the effect of NAST in men’s marathon performance, (ii) to analyse whether the changes in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind) and orography of the marathons, age and birthplace of the runners has changed from 2015 to 2019 and (iii) to analyse the impact of NAST on the historical 50 best performances. Data from top-100 men's marathon performances were collected in that timeframe. The shoes used by the athletes were identified (in 91.8% of the cases) by publicly available photographs. External and environmental conditions of each marathon and age and birthplace of the runners were also analysed. Marathon performances improved from 2017 onwards between 0.75 and 1.50% compared to 2015 and 2016 (p < 0.05). In addition, the improvement was greater in the upper deciles than in the lower ones (p < 0.001). Runners wearing NAST ran ~ 1% faster in marathon compared to runners that did not use it (p < 0.001). When conducting an individual analysis of athletes who ran with and without NAST, 72.5% of the athletes who completed a marathon wearing NAST improved their performance by 0.68% (p < 0.01). External and environmental conditions, age or birthplace of runners seems not to have influenced this performance improvement. NAST has had a clear impact on marathon performance unchanged in the environmental constraints (temperature and wind), orography, age, and birthplace of the runners but with differences between venues.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10578/39719
url https://hdl.handle.net/10578/39719
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
instname:Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
instname_str Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha
reponame_str RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
collection RUIdeRA. Repositorio Institucional de la UCLM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869407181499006976
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia