A Sustainability-oriented framework for evaluating the “Hardcore Strength” of world-class ports: Multi-dimensional indicators and game-theoretic weight integration
Building world-class ports requires not only scale expansion but also sustainable structural capability. However, the concept of port “hardcore strength” remains insufficiently clarified and operationalized in existing sustainability and port evaluation research. In this study, port hardcore strengt...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:upcommonspor::2eb03b434bd04cabc8342bc2927b2cf5 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/460488 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su18083751 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Sustainable port development World-class ports Port evaluation smart and green governance Multi-criteria decision-making Bland–Altman analysis Game-theoretic weighting Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria civil::Enginyeria hidràulica, marítima i sanitària |
| Sumario: | Building world-class ports requires not only scale expansion but also sustainable structural capability. However, the concept of port “hardcore strength” remains insufficiently clarified and operationalized in existing sustainability and port evaluation research. In this study, port hardcore strength is understood as an integrated capability framework covering infrastructure efficiency and logistics capability, connectivity and regional integration, maritime services and industrial clustering, strategic leadership and innovation capability, and sustainable governance and green port development. This study proposes a sustainability-oriented evaluation framework for assessing the “hardcore strength” of world-class ports through a multi-dimensional indicator system. Methodologically, the study integrates the EWM and CRITIC, and introduces Bland–Altman analysis to examine whether the EWM and CRITIC weight vectors exhibit an obvious systematic bias prior to game-theoretic integration. Using 18 representative global ports from 2019 to 2023 as a case study, the results show that the overall ranking structure remains broadly stable, with Singapore Port and Shanghai Port consistently ranking first and second, respectively, while some middle-ranked ports exhibit moderate positional changes. The findings suggest that differences in world-class port development are rooted not only in operational scale, but also in the coordination of multiple capability dimensions. The study enriches the understanding of world-class port evaluation from a sustainability-oriented perspective. |
|---|