Rainbow trout welfare: comparing stunning methods in winter and summer
This study investigates the effects of three stunning methods: thermal shock (TS), electric shock at 200 mA 2 s (ES2), and electric shock at 400 mA 0.5 s followed by 200 mA 1.5 s (ES4) - both electric shock treatments followed by thermal shock - on the stress response and energy metabolism of rainbo...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM) |
| Repositorio: | Docta Complutense |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/124475 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/124475 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 639.3 Electric shock Rainbow trout Seasonality Stress response Thermal shock Piscicultura 3105.02 Piscicultura |
| Sumario: | This study investigates the effects of three stunning methods: thermal shock (TS), electric shock at 200 mA 2 s (ES2), and electric shock at 400 mA 0.5 s followed by 200 mA 1.5 s (ES4) - both electric shock treatments followed by thermal shock - on the stress response and energy metabolism of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) during winter and summer. A significant interaction between stunning method and season was observed for blood cortisol levels. In summer, cortisol concentrations were elevated regardless of the stunning method, whereas in winter, the ES4 method resulted in the lowest cortisol levels. Seasonal variation significantly influenced stress response in trout, with summer conditions leading to higher cortisol levels, darker skin pigmentation, and reduced liver glycogen and lipid reserves. Increased metabolic activity during summer was associated with enhanced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, which triggered the upregulation of key antioxidant enzymes (sod, gpx, cat, gst). The results suggest that the choice of stunning method is critical in mitigating stress, with electrical stunning combined with thermal shock being more effective than thermal shock alone, particularly under elevated temperatures. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing stunning practices to improve fish welfare, especially in the context of climate change. Understanding the interplay between seasonal and procedural stressors provides valuable insights for improving aquaculture management and sustainability |
|---|