Evaluation of abdominal gas by plain abdominal radiographs
Our aim was to determine the reliability of plain abdominal radiographs for the evaluation of abdominal gas content in patients with functional digestive symptoms. Abdominal CT scan scout views, mimicking a conventional plain abdominal radiograph, were obtained from 30 patients both during episodes...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:281690 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/281690 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/nmo.14485 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Abdominal CT imaging Abdominal distension Abdominal radiographs Intestinal gas |
| Sumario: | Our aim was to determine the reliability of plain abdominal radiographs for the evaluation of abdominal gas content in patients with functional digestive symptoms. Abdominal CT scan scout views, mimicking a conventional plain abdominal radiograph, were obtained from 30 patients both during episodes of abdominal distension and basal conditions. Physicians (n = 50) were instructed to rate the estimated volume of gas in the 60 images presented in random sequence using a scale graded from 0 to ≥600 ml. The gas volumes estimated in the scout views differed from those measured by CT by a median of 90 (95% CI 70-102) ml, and the misestimation was not related to the absolute volume in the image. The accuracy of the observers, measured by their mean misestimation, was not related to their specialty or the training status (misestimation by 96 (95% CI 85-104) ml in staff vs 78 (70-106) ml in residents; p = 0.297). The accuracy was independent of the order of presentation of the images. Gas volume measured by CT in the images obtained during episodes of abdominal distension differed by a median of 39 (95% CI 29-66) ml from those during basal conditions, and this difference was misestimated by a median of 107 (95% CI 94-119) ml. The accuracy of these estimations was not related to the absolute gas volumes (R = -0.352; p < 0.001) or the magnitude of the differences. Plain abdominal radiographs have limited value for the evaluation of abdominal gas volume in patients with functional gut disorders. Example of three-dimensional reconstruction of abdominal CT scan showing intestinal gas. Plain AP projection (scout view) of the same scan. Relation between objective values of intestinal gas, measured by a validated CT technique in patients with functional gut disorders, and the subjective estimation of gas volumes on plain AP projection of the same CT scans (scout views) by 48 physicians. Individual estimations of 60 images are shown. CONCLUSION: The volumes of abdominal gas were grossly misestimated in the scout views, indicating that plain abdominal radiographs have no value for the evaluation of intestinal gas volume in patients with functional gut disorders. |
|---|