Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design

Sub-gingival margin placement is sometimes required due to different reasons and is often associated with adverse periodontal reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine if a single restoration with subgingival margin on a tooth, in the maxillary anterior zone, would affect its periodontal...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor: Paniz, Gianluca
Formato: tesis doctoral
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2016
País:España
Recursos:CBUC, CESCA
Repositorio:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
OAI Identifier:oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/387222
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10803/387222
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Periodontology
Periodontics
Periodontologia
Periodòncia
Odontologia
616.3
id ES_41ffd7e8962d6d7bae559c56d1c9e2de
oai_identifier_str oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/387222
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin DesignPaniz, GianlucaPeriodontologyPeriodonticsPeriodontologiaPeriodònciaOdontologia616.3Sub-gingival margin placement is sometimes required due to different reasons and is often associated with adverse periodontal reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine if a single restoration with subgingival margin on a tooth, in the maxillary anterior zone, would affect its periodontal soft tissue parameters, and whether or not a deep chamfer preparation has a different influence in the periodontium when compared to a feather edge preparation. Plaque and gingival indexes, periodontal probing depth, bleeding on probing and patient’s biotype were registered. 106 teeth were prepared with a deep chamfer, while 94 were prepared with a feather edge finishing line. Six and twelve month after the restorations delivery the same parameters were evaluated. Repeated measure one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA ) (α=0.05) was used. At six months the patient A statistically significant difference between baseline and the 6 and 12-month follow up is present in regards to plaque index, gingival index and periodontal probing depth, but no statistically significant difference between chamfer and feather edge finishing lines. There is a statistically significant difference between baseline and the 6 and 12-month follow up in regards to bleeding on probing. Feather edge preparation presents significantly more bleeding on probing and less gingival recession than the chamfer. Sub-gingival margins do influence the periodontal soft tissue response. Statistically significant difference exists between feather edge and chamfer finishing lines in regards to bleeding on probing and gingival recession. Subgingival margins should be carefully selected, especially when feather edge finishing line is utilized.Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaNart Molina, JoséUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya. Departament d'Odontologia201620162016info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion105 p.application/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10803/387222TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)reponame:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Redinstname:CBUC, CESCAInglésL'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi queda condicionat a l'acceptació de les condicions d'ús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:www.tdx.cat:10803/3872222026-06-14T12:46:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
title Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
spellingShingle Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
Paniz, Gianluca
Periodontology
Periodontics
Periodontologia
Periodòncia
Odontologia
616.3
title_short Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
title_full Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
title_fullStr Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
title_sort Prospective Clinical Evaluation of Periodontal Response to Different Prosthetic Margin Design
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Paniz, Gianluca
author Paniz, Gianluca
author_facet Paniz, Gianluca
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Nart Molina, José
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya. Departament d'Odontologia
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Periodontology
Periodontics
Periodontologia
Periodòncia
Odontologia
616.3
topic Periodontology
Periodontics
Periodontologia
Periodòncia
Odontologia
616.3
description Sub-gingival margin placement is sometimes required due to different reasons and is often associated with adverse periodontal reactions. The purpose of this study was to determine if a single restoration with subgingival margin on a tooth, in the maxillary anterior zone, would affect its periodontal soft tissue parameters, and whether or not a deep chamfer preparation has a different influence in the periodontium when compared to a feather edge preparation. Plaque and gingival indexes, periodontal probing depth, bleeding on probing and patient’s biotype were registered. 106 teeth were prepared with a deep chamfer, while 94 were prepared with a feather edge finishing line. Six and twelve month after the restorations delivery the same parameters were evaluated. Repeated measure one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA ) (α=0.05) was used. At six months the patient A statistically significant difference between baseline and the 6 and 12-month follow up is present in regards to plaque index, gingival index and periodontal probing depth, but no statistically significant difference between chamfer and feather edge finishing lines. There is a statistically significant difference between baseline and the 6 and 12-month follow up in regards to bleeding on probing. Feather edge preparation presents significantly more bleeding on probing and less gingival recession than the chamfer. Sub-gingival margins do influence the periodontal soft tissue response. Statistically significant difference exists between feather edge and chamfer finishing lines in regards to bleeding on probing and gingival recession. Subgingival margins should be carefully selected, especially when feather edge finishing line is utilized.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2016
2016
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10803/387222
url http://hdl.handle.net/10803/387222
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 105 p.
application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Internacional de Catalunya
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)
reponame:TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
instname:CBUC, CESCA
instname_str CBUC, CESCA
reponame_str TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
collection TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406893523337216
score 15,301603