Una invectiva inédita contra Gracias y desgracias del ojo del culo de Quevedo
This article aims to give notice about the existence of an unknown invective against Gracias y desgracias del ojo del culo, one of the most famous Francisco de Quevedo’s burlesque works. That printed work is entitled Excelencias y desagravios de los nobilísimos ojos de la cara, y zurriago contra el...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC) |
| Repositorio: | Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/16231 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10347/16231 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Materias::Investigación::62 Ciencias de las artes y las letras::6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias Materias::Investigación::62 Ciencias de las artes y las letras::6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias::620201 Crítica de textos Materias::Investigación::62 Ciencias de las artes y las letras::6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias::620202 Análisis literario Materias::Investigación::62 Ciencias de las artes y las letras::6202 Teoría, análisis y crítica literarias::620203 Estilo y estética literarios Materias::Investigación::55 Historia::5506 Historia por especialidades::550613 Historia de la literatura |
| Sumario: | This article aims to give notice about the existence of an unknown invective against Gracias y desgracias del ojo del culo, one of the most famous Francisco de Quevedo’s burlesque works. That printed work is entitled Excelencias y desagravios de los nobilísimos ojos de la cara, y zurriago contra el abogado del nefando ojo del culo. Published in the seventeenth century without date or place of printing, this new invective is now kept in the Biblioteca Valenciana and it has never been described. The author of this work remains hidden behind the pseudonym “Bachiller Polvorín de Tras-Te-Riego”. This new testimony is very interesting for completing the complex puzzle of the abundant controversial texts against Quevedo and his works, which were especially written and divulged along the decade between 1626 and 1635. Additionally, this unknown textual source draw critical attention to one aspect: the fact that this invective could have been one of the earliest among all known invectives so far. Its textual source might have not been one of the numerous preserved manuscripts but the first edition of Quevedo’s text, dated between 1620 and 1626, as the author suggests when describing the atmosphere in the Court of Spain where it was released. However, the real author of the invective and the circumstances of its writing and publishing are still needed of further inquiries. |
|---|