Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration

TUdi - Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in EU and China. Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation. Referencia del proyecto: 101000224. Partner/Coordinador principal: José Alfonso Gómez Calero – Instituto de Agricultura So...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hayas López, Antonio, Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/366352
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/366352
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85196378139
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Landscape
Bank collapse
Flow erosion
Geotechnical
id ES_3ef53b400a9024c2bf947dbee4b6334f
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/366352
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
title Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
spellingShingle Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
Hayas López, Antonio
Landscape
Bank collapse
Flow erosion
Geotechnical
title_short Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
title_full Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
title_fullStr Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
title_full_unstemmed Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
title_sort Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restoration
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hayas López, Antonio
Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
author Hayas López, Antonio
author_facet Hayas López, Antonio
Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
author_role author
author2 Gómez Calero, José Alfonso
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv European Commission
Junta de Andalucía
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Landscape
Bank collapse
Flow erosion
Geotechnical
topic Landscape
Bank collapse
Flow erosion
Geotechnical
description TUdi - Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in EU and China. Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation. Referencia del proyecto: 101000224. Partner/Coordinador principal: José Alfonso Gómez Calero – Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible IAS- CSIC.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bc
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/366352
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85196378139
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/366352
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85196378139
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101000224
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-105793RB-I00
The underlying dataset has been published as supplementary material of the article in the publisher platform at DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104836
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104836
Sí
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406600975876096
spelling Modelling of gully widening, a review. Implications for research on gully evolution and restorationHayas López, AntonioGómez Calero, José AlfonsoLandscapeBank collapseFlow erosionGeotechnicalTUdi - Transforming Unsustainable management of soils in key agricultural systems in EU and China. Developing an integrated platform of alternatives to reverse soil degradation. Referencia del proyecto: 101000224. Partner/Coordinador principal: José Alfonso Gómez Calero – Instituto de Agricultura Sostenible IAS- CSIC.Gully erosion is recognised as a major soil degradation process, with gully growth being a complex phenomenon that is controlled by different processes: incision, gully headcut retreat and gully widening, coupling at different spatial and temporal scales. While gully modelling research has paid considerable attention to headcut retreat processes and incision, our review of the available literature in Web of Science database shows that less attention has been paid to the modelling of gully widening processes. This might hamper progress on gully evolution studies or on gully control and restoration programmes. Our review has found seven models described in the indexed literature: three of them empirical, three based on processes, and a seventh one that can be classified as hybrid. The latter, despite being based on process-based equations, is simplified and requires empirical calibration for implementation. Our review has also noted a limited number of publications using these models, rather for validation or for case studies, with very few examples of models used outside the team that developed it. Of the four process-based models, two of them are the most comprehensive - BSTEM and GULTEM - both incorporating a combination of processes to predict bank failure based on soil, climate and vegetation parameters, coupled with others describing the effect of concentrated channel flow. A third one, the Bank Failure Model (hereafter BFM), is also embedded in the well know landscape evolution model CHILD. Of the seven models identified, only two of them, BSTEM and BFM through CHILD, are directly available to potential users with access to executable versions and instructions, while the others need to be requested from the authors or built from the published equations. The models cover a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, from event to centuries, and from gully stretch to regional scale. Our review suggests that process-based models are the ones providing the most comprehensive approach, especially those including geotechnical approaches, although they would benefit from further development to include wider spatial and temporal scales. This research suggests that more studies and field data are required for calibration, understanding lateral flows, wetting and drying cycles, tension crack prediction, and integrating widening with other gully erosion processes. They should also include further testing and validation of available models beyond the teams that developed them, ideally in model intercomparison exercises.This work has been possible thanks to the contribution of the Postdoctoral fellowship (POSTDOC_21_00342) from the Andalusian Plan for Research, Development and Innovation (PAIDI 2020), project TUdi (GA 101000224) from European Union's Horizon 2020 research program and project ALIVE (Ref: PID2019-105793RB-I00) of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.Peer reviewedElsevierEuropean CommissionJunta de AndalucíaMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (España)Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202420242024info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcPublisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/366352https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85196378139reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101000224info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-105793RB-I00The underlying dataset has been published as supplementary material of the article in the publisher platform at DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104836https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2024.104836Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3663522026-05-22T06:33:51Z
score 15,812429

Similares en LA Referencia