Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study

Objectives To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics. Method Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to origi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mascato Fontaiña, Noa, Candal Pedreira, Cristina, García, Guadalupe, Ross, Joseph S, Ruano Raviña, Alberto, Martín Gisbert, Lucía
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
Repositorio:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/44623
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/10347/44623
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Paper mills
Reseach integrity
Retractions
Academic journals
Publication ethics
3202 Epidemologia
3212 Salud pública
id ES_3eaff6cf2bc7479f28ababcce1e28cd3
oai_identifier_str oai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/44623
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
title Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
spellingShingle Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
Mascato Fontaiña, Noa
Paper mills
Reseach integrity
Retractions
Academic journals
Publication ethics
3202 Epidemologia
3212 Salud pública
title_short Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
title_full Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
title_sort Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Mascato Fontaiña, Noa
Candal Pedreira, Cristina
García, Guadalupe
Ross, Joseph S
Ruano Raviña, Alberto
Martín Gisbert, Lucía
author Mascato Fontaiña, Noa
author_facet Mascato Fontaiña, Noa
Candal Pedreira, Cristina
García, Guadalupe
Ross, Joseph S
Ruano Raviña, Alberto
Martín Gisbert, Lucía
author_role author
author2 Candal Pedreira, Cristina
García, Guadalupe
Ross, Joseph S
Ruano Raviña, Alberto
Martín Gisbert, Lucía
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e Medicina
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Ambientais (CRETUS)

dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Paper mills
Reseach integrity
Retractions
Academic journals
Publication ethics
3202 Epidemologia
3212 Salud pública
topic Paper mills
Reseach integrity
Retractions
Academic journals
Publication ethics
3202 Epidemologia
3212 Salud pública
description Objectives To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics. Method Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to originating from paper mills and journals, between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on the total number of articles and journal characteristics were obtained from Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports. Journals were classified based on the frequency of retracted paper mill papers (1, 2–9, ≥ 10 retractions). Logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between retraction frequency and journal characteristics. Results One hundred forty-two journals were identified that retracted 2,051 articles from paper mills. Among these, 71 (50%) journals had 1 retraction, 36 (25.4%) had 2–9 retractions, and 35 (24.6%) had ≥ 10 retractions; 4 (2.8%) journals had > 100 retractions. These journals, regardless of paper mill retraction number, were mainly in the second (35.2%) and third (29.6%) quartiles by impact factor. Medicine and health emerged as the predominant subject area, comprising 61.2% of all indexed journal categories. Comparing journals with one retraction to those with ten or more, the proportion of open access articles (72.6% vs. 19.2%) and median editorial times (86 vs. 116 days) differed across groups, although these differences were not statistically significant. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of paper mill papers and original articles (Spearman’s Rho = –0.1891, 95%CI -0.370 to -0.008). Logistic regressions found no significant association between paper mill retraction number and other variables. Conclusion This study suggests that paper mill retractions are concentrated in a small number of journals with common characteristics: high open access rates, intermediate impact factor quartiles, a high volume of citable items, and classification in medicine and health categories. Short editorial times may indicate a higher presence of paper mill publications, but more research is needed to examine this factor in depth, as well as the possible influence of acceptance rates
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2025-10-01
2025
2025-10-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv journal article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/10347/44623
url https://hdl.handle.net/10347/44623
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv BMC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
instname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
instname_str Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)
reponame_str Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
collection Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostela
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869406569263792128
spelling Identifying common patterns in journals that retracted papers from paper mills: a cross-sectional studyMascato Fontaiña, NoaCandal Pedreira, CristinaGarcía, GuadalupeRoss, Joseph SRuano Raviña, AlbertoMartín Gisbert, LucíaPaper millsReseach integrityRetractionsAcademic journalsPublication ethics3202 Epidemologia3212 Salud públicaObjectives To characterize journals that published and retracted articles retracted for having originated from paper mills and examine associations between paper mill retraction frequency and journal characteristics. Method Retraction Watch database was used to identify papers retracted due to originating from paper mills and journals, between January 2020 and December 2022. Data on the total number of articles and journal characteristics were obtained from Web of Science and Journal Citation Reports. Journals were classified based on the frequency of retracted paper mill papers (1, 2–9, ≥ 10 retractions). Logistic regressions were conducted to explore associations between retraction frequency and journal characteristics. Results One hundred forty-two journals were identified that retracted 2,051 articles from paper mills. Among these, 71 (50%) journals had 1 retraction, 36 (25.4%) had 2–9 retractions, and 35 (24.6%) had ≥ 10 retractions; 4 (2.8%) journals had > 100 retractions. These journals, regardless of paper mill retraction number, were mainly in the second (35.2%) and third (29.6%) quartiles by impact factor. Medicine and health emerged as the predominant subject area, comprising 61.2% of all indexed journal categories. Comparing journals with one retraction to those with ten or more, the proportion of open access articles (72.6% vs. 19.2%) and median editorial times (86 vs. 116 days) differed across groups, although these differences were not statistically significant. An inverse correlation was observed between the proportion of paper mill papers and original articles (Spearman’s Rho = –0.1891, 95%CI -0.370 to -0.008). Logistic regressions found no significant association between paper mill retraction number and other variables. Conclusion This study suggests that paper mill retractions are concentrated in a small number of journals with common characteristics: high open access rates, intermediate impact factor quartiles, a high volume of citable items, and classification in medicine and health categories. Short editorial times may indicate a higher presence of paper mill publications, but more research is needed to examine this factor in depth, as well as the possible influence of acceptance ratesBMCUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Departamento de Psiquiatría, Radioloxía, Saúde Pública, Enfermaría e MedicinaUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela. Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigación en Tecnoloxías Ambientais (CRETUS)20252025-10-0120252025-10-01journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/10347/44623reponame:Minerva. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Santiago de Compostelainstname:Universidad de Santiago de Compostela (USC)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2© The Author(s) 2025. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holderhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:minerva.usc.gal:10347/446232026-06-15T12:47:27Z
score 15.811543