La intervención pública en rehabilitación y regeneración urbana en Barcelona : caracterización de claves operativas y metodológicas
(English) There is a broad consensus on the need to drive urban intervention public policies with the purpose of promoting more inclusive, sustainable, balanced and diverse cities. Urban intervention is not neutral; it has a significant impact causing changes in the urban context and, at the same ti...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | CBUC, CESCA |
| Repositorio: | TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/689808 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/10803/689808 https://dx.doi.org/10.5821/dissertation-2117-400321 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Urbanisme 71 |
| Resumo: | (English) There is a broad consensus on the need to drive urban intervention public policies with the purpose of promoting more inclusive, sustainable, balanced and diverse cities. Urban intervention is not neutral; it has a significant impact causing changes in the urban context and, at the same time, in the social and economic structure. The mission of correcting urban imbalances fundamentally concerns the public administration. It is clear that there is room for improvement for public effort towards urban rehabilitation and regeneration processes, where intervention models that gather new instruments and methodologies are being developed. The main goal of this study is to examine and aim at the improvement of public intervention in urban environments, starting from a critical, empirical and operational perspective. In order to do so, the analysis focuses on the criteria and essential tools generally considered in both the design and subsequent management of public programs. The framework of the projects is examined in depth, from the context of intervention, the complexity of the public governance and its deficits, the difficulties related to the evaluation its intervention, altogether with an analysis of relevant experiences in Barcelona. The methodology followed combines a triangulation of theoretical, empirical and a critical vision of experts. It is expected that this strategy the emerging aspects of public policies and strengthens the conclusions derived from the research. Both, structural and operational malfunction, are evidenced and contradict the principles of efficiency and efficacy that are required for any public performance. In this sense, in urban rehabilitation and regeneration, these dimensions should be considered: the imbalance of processes and charges between administrations in terms of financing of public policies; the deficit of citizen engagement and institutional collaboration towards a sustainable management, as well as the systematic oblivion of the analysis and evaluation which obstructs transparency and collective learning. As a result of these reflections, some adjustments in the intervention models are proposed focused in fundamental questions of the operations. If the leadership of the urban intervention is public, in consequence, the appropriate use of legal instruments and management models should also be public. Likewise, the consensual management of design in urban intervention should be led. Not every public intervention provides the expected results, making it necessary to evaluate and identify the adverse effects that it collaterally produces. In a scene in which the capacity of public resources is limited, a holistic transversal vision of public policies of urban rehabilitation and regeneration provides added benefits in terms of their sustainability. It is essential to incorporate this approach. |
|---|